Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99
News Opinion Readers Respond

Harris has good reason to oppose D.C. marijuana law [Letter]

Your recent editorial, "The Harris boycott" (July 7) put far too much emphasis on the politics and not enough on what really matters. The Washington, D.C., City Council has just passed the most lenient marijuana decriminalization law in the nation, with a $25 fine that is not only less than the average traffic ticket but involves no point system. Do we really want the capital of our nation and mecca for family tourism to go down this path?

The data show that states with lenient decriminalization laws have higher rates of youth use, as reported to the Centers for Disease Control, than those that have stricter decriminalization with higher civil penalties for the first offense, increasing penalties for repeat offenders, and/or requirements for drug education. In some states that have decriminalized in practice, the offense is still a misdemeanor criminal charge that is removed from the books only if you go through the court system. Most counties in Maryland had a similar "diversion" system for those apprehended for possession, even before our recently passed, and relatively strict, decriminalization law. For other states with strict decriminalization codes, check out the laws in Mississippi, Minnesota, Nebraska, Nevada, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, and Vermont. The states with historically lenient decriminalization codes and high rates of youth marijuana use are Alaska, Maine, Massachusetts and, of course, Colorado.

As much as marijuana advocates may claim that laws don't make a difference to drug use, their position flies in the face of common sense and the truth.

Christine L. Miller, Baltimore

To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • End America's failed war on marijuana
    End America's failed war on marijuana

    Regarding Daniel Takash's thoughtful commentary on marijuana laws, marijuana prohibition is indefensible ("Marijuana legalization is the only option," Oct. 27).

  • Maryland should legalize pot [Letter]
    Maryland should legalize pot [Letter]

    I think it should be a person's own choice to do whatever drug a person chooses as long as it doesn't involve committing a crime to acquire the drug. When it comes to marijuana, we should be able to have and smoke as much as we like ("Fixing Md.'s marijuana law," Oct. 3).

  • Pot users treated as non-persons
    Pot users treated as non-persons

    Maryland legislators should take in account U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment in their consideration of what to do with the marijuana laws ("Maryland lawmakers take fresh run at legalizing marijuana," Jan. 31). No state shall deprive a person of their life, liberty and property without due...

  • Fixing Md.'s marijuana law [Editorial]
    Fixing Md.'s marijuana law [Editorial]

    Our view: Already critics are poking holes in the state's pot decriminalization law are becoming clear; lawmakers should fix the obvious problems but otherwise wait to see how it works in practice

  • Repeal destructive drug laws [Letter]
    Repeal destructive drug laws [Letter]

    McKenzie Elliott, the 3-year-old shot to death in Baltimore, is a recent victim of misguided drug laws ("Politicians, churchmen talk policing in Northwest Baltimore," Sept. 9). While I do not support open use of "illegal drugs," I do not find that drug sales or use represent a criminal act....

  • Medical marijuana rules a work in progress [Letter]
    Medical marijuana rules a work in progress [Letter]

    As members of the Natalie M. LaPrade Medical Marijuana Commission's policy subcommittee, we are honored to be able to serve our fellow citizens to develop a program that makes medical marijuana available to those Marylanders who have not found relief from conventional treatments and may benefit...