Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Voter ID laws don't disenfranchise minorities and the poor

I am tired of hearing people say that requiring someone to produce a photo ID in order to vote is a form of voter suppression ("Vote suppression in Pa.," Aug. 17). There is little of importance one can do in our society that does not require showing a photo ID.

Examples include traveling by plane, giving blood, getting a medical diagnostic test, seeking treatment at a clinic, cashing a check, purchasing an item by check, picking up mail at the Post Office and having a document notarized in Maryland.

The reason for the photo ID law is to ensure that not a single fraudulent vote is cast in any election. That is a laudable goal, and it is not voter suppression.

One must wonder what the real motives are of those who protest and trivialize efforts to protect one of our most sacred rights and responsibilities.

Joseph F Greenbeck Jr., Parkville

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Voter ID should be bipartisan goal

    Voter ID should be bipartisan goal

    I think it is way past the time to enact legislation to require a federal ID system because I never know if my vote in Maryland can be compromised by someone who is not a citizen ("Messing with voting rights in Texas," Oct. 21).

  • Forget ID, make voters pass a quiz

    Forget ID, make voters pass a quiz

    Rather than voter identification, I propose a civics test be given when entering the voting booth ("Messing with voting rights in Texas," Oct. 20). If you don't answer four out of five questions correctly, the voting machine is turned off.