Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. $12 for 12 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

Don't spike volleyball at Rash Field [Letter]

As a member of Baltimore Beach Volleyball for the past three years, I take strong exception to how volleyball at Rash Field is viewed so negatively by The Sun ("Inner Harbor reborn," Nov. 17). Being a new resident of the city several years ago, Baltimore Beach gave me a reason to come to the Inner Harbor every week. Without this incentive, I'm afraid the overtly tourist and rundown ambience of the city's biggest "attraction" does not appeal to the majority of young, working professionals.

These same professionals are the ones frequenting local shops, bars and restaurants as a part of their social gatherings. Why is this large number of users, thousands every week, being cut out instead of catered to?

As an architect, it is my job to study and understand space and how people use it and interact within it. Organized social gatherings, such as Baltimore Beach Volleyball, promote a general sense of safety and comfort in an area, not only for the users but for others who may be simply walking by. The new proposals addition of "a park, playground, sculpture garden, outdoor cafes, kayak launch, and floating swimming pool" seem like a blind attempt to throw the "kitchen sink" at a perceived issue.

I'm afraid that the end result will be an Inner Harbor that offers much while offering nothing. Actually, this is exactly how I would describe the current Inner Harbor, save for Rash Field.

Ryan J. Hausmann

-
To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Why isn't volleyball part of Rash Field plans? [Letter]
    Why isn't volleyball part of Rash Field plans? [Letter]

    I am offended by your Nov. 17 editorial on the new Inner Harbor plan ("Inner Harbor reborn". Your implication that the Baltimore Beach Volleyball League at Rash Field is just another in a "hodgepodge of attractions" is insulting.

  • Here's why you should care about torture
    Here's why you should care about torture

    In his letter to the editor, Mark Wilson ("Who cares what the CIA does to terrorists?" Dec. 21) asks whether he is living in the "Twilight Zone" because he sees nothing wrong with torturing people to get so-called information from them. Perhaps he is. He fails to grasp that the people in...

  • U.S., Russia and the energy revolution
    U.S., Russia and the energy revolution

    Citing the American "fracking revolution" as a significant factor in Russia's economic crisis, writers Jim Rosapepe and Sheilah Kast go a bit overboard in linking it with the comparative success of capitalism and democracy ("How dangerous is Russia?" Dec. 22).

  • Russian 'menace' is overstated
    Russian 'menace' is overstated

    Jim Rosapepe and Sheilah Kast's commentary, "How dangerous is Russia?" (Dec. 22), sets up some straw men and creates a specter of menace over the current twist in Russian relations versus the West. But Russia never invaded the West while historically both Napoleon and Adolf Hitler invaded the...

  • Phelps should have been given ignition interlock
    Phelps should have been given ignition interlock

    In its reporting of the judicial disposition in Michael Phelps' latest DUI conviction ("Michael Phelps gets no jail time after entering guilty plea in DUI case," Dec. 19), The Baltimore Sun quoted the presiding judge as saying that if Mr. Phelps doesn't get the message this time, "the only...

  • Reaching out to survivors
    Reaching out to survivors

    Thanks to Andrea K. McDaniels for her compassionate reporting on the trauma experienced by survivors of those who have been killed in violent crimes ("Relatives of Baltimore murder victims struggle with grief," Dec. 20). The collaborative effort in the Upton-Druid Heights area to support the...

Comments
Loading