Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99
News Opinion Readers Respond

Why isn't volleyball part of Rash Field plans? [Letter]

I am offended by your Nov. 17 editorial on the new Inner Harbor plan ("Inner Harbor reborn". Your implication that the Baltimore Beach Volleyball League at Rash Field is just another in a "hodgepodge of attractions" is insulting.

For 10 years, this league has anchored the southern part of the Inner Harbor, providing a healthy, fun sport for thousands of city and non-city residents. Every night of the week people come together to play, then go out and spend money at local establishments. The league is truly a unique attraction to have in a city center.

Perhaps you should have referenced the many surveys over the last several years in which residents voted to keep volleyball in the new harbor plans. Neither you nor the Greater Baltimore Committee even acknowledged those surveys. One look at the comments on GBC's website says it all, with most postings showing dismay at the volleyball omission. Maybe our voice was edited out in favor of those with larger bankrolls. The efforts to bring city neighborhoods together will be harmed by omitting the league from the harbor's new plans.

Dominic DiDomenico

-
To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Inner Harbor is residential, too
    Inner Harbor is residential, too

    I live at the Inner Harbor and for years even published a local newsletter. And yes, Celia Neustadt, I've heard about the Inner Harbor Project ("Preventing another Ferguson in Baltimore," Feb. 6).

  • An Inner Harbor for locals [Letter]

    Dan Rodricks is firing on all cylinders again in his recent column championing the idea that the Inner Harbor should not just be a tourist attraction and something that the city can squeeze ever more revenue out of but something that becomes a part of city dwellers' lives ("A remade Inner...

  • Don't rush into Inner Harbor 2.0 [Letter]
    Don't rush into Inner Harbor 2.0 [Letter]

    Less than a week ago I found out about the Inner Harbor 2.0 master plan ("Inner Harbor reborn," Nov. 17). This is an ambitious and much needed concept. Although I make a valiant effort to stay on top of local news and projects, the Waterfront Partnership's proposal came as a complete surprise.

  • Inner Harbor reborn [Editorial]
    Inner Harbor reborn [Editorial]

    Our view: The city has a great plan to revitalize its best known public space; now all it needs is for the private sector to step up with funding

  • Pedestrian bridge poor choice for harbor [Letter]
    Pedestrian bridge poor choice for harbor [Letter]

    While most might agree that the Inner Harbor is need of a facelift, the proposed pedestrian bridge is not a smart idea ("City to unveil Inner Harbor master plan," Nov. 13). Much has been said in The Sun about the importance of capitalizing on Baltimore's maritime heritage. It is unique,...

  • Md. Democrats offer ruinous agenda
    Md. Democrats offer ruinous agenda

    I wonder where the rulers in the Maryland Senate and House of Delegates are going to get the money to fund what Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller described as the Democratic agenda ("Senate panel rewrites Hogan's charter school law," March 26)? I guess they will do what they do every...

Comments
Loading