Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99
News Opinion Readers Respond

The U.S. is facing a crisis over jobs and growth, not debt

A reader commenting on Rep. Chris Van Hollen's op-ed "Medicaid cuts would hurt us all" (July 25) bemoans his lack of commitment to seriously reduce the national debt. But his priorities and solution are questionable.

We have a crisis, but it's one of sluggish economic and job growth, not the deficit. If the deficit were an immediate crisis, the world wouldn't be nearly so anxious to purchase U.S. Treasury bonds at historically low interest rates.

One can cut all the discretionary spending one wants, but the fact remains that growth, not spending cuts, is the only thing that will solve our long-term deficit problem. And you can't cut your way to growth.

When adjusted for inflation and population growth, non-security discretionary spending is the same today as it was in 2001 — $369 billion. There was no reason any agreement on the long-term deficit had to be coupled to raising the debt ceiling.

In fact, raising the debt ceiling has nothing to do with long-term future spending. The debt ceiling is about paying for spending already approved by previous Congresses and presidents.

President Bush added almost $4 trillion to the deficit and, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Ms. Bush's two tax cuts and two wars will account for nearly half the public debt by 2019.

If Congress and the president had focused on the crisis of jobs and growth instead of on debt, the solutions they might have come up with would also have been the best long-term solutions to the debt crisis.

Meanwhile, drastic cuts in government spending at this time will only increase public and private sector job losses and threaten a return to recession.

One has to wonder about the true motives of some in the Republican Party. They certainly had no concern as to the size of the debt during the Reagan and Bush years. Is it possible that some now see a chance to use the debt issue as a way to destroy the Obama presidency and unravel all the gains made during FDR's New Deal?

Jack Kinstlinger, Baltimore

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Van Hollen shows why it will be so hard to reduce the deficit

    The article in today's Sun by Rep. Chris Van Hollen ("Medicaid cuts would hurt us all," July 25) demonstrates how difficult it will be to reduce our budget deficit. While giving lip service to the need to reduce our federal budget deficit, he then maintains that there should be no reduction...

  • Van Hollen: In budget balancing, we must preserve Medicaid
    Van Hollen: In budget balancing, we must preserve Medicaid

    Top Democrat on the House budget committee, says health insurance for the poor has a tremendous economic impact

  • Md. Democrats offer ruinous agenda
    Md. Democrats offer ruinous agenda

    I wonder where the rulers in the Maryland Senate and House of Delegates are going to get the money to fund what Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller described as the Democratic agenda ("Senate panel rewrites Hogan's charter school law," March 26)? I guess they will do what they do every...

  • Don't shed tears for Bergdahl
    Don't shed tears for Bergdahl

    Your editorial regarding Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl is typical of The Sun's liberal agenda ("Hero or traitor?" March 27). So much concern for the deserter, but nary a word about the six men who gave their lives trying to rescue him.

  • Black-on-black crime is not just a problem for blacks
    Black-on-black crime is not just a problem for blacks

    Baltimore Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake has sent a message to African-American men to step up and take responsibility for guiding black youths away from violence ("City leaders call on black men to mentor youths and stop the violence," March 25).

  • Maryland needs renewable energy
    Maryland needs renewable energy

    The first day of spring ironically delivered another snowstorm in Maryland ("Before spring, snow threatens Baltimore once more," March 19). Fluke weather patterns are expected to become more severe as climate change persists. The extreme shifts from warm sunny days to cold, wintry ones takes...