Summer Savings! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

Letter mischaracterizes vaccine op-ed

While Steven Salzberg's readers-response letter may accurately reflect his point of view ("Sun gives voice to dangerous anti-vaccination fear-mongering," July 13), he significantly mischaracterizes important aspects of my July 11th op-ed, "We don't know enough about childhood vaccines."

The main point of my op-ed is a simple fact, a number. The federal government recommends 36 doses of vaccines for every child during the first two years of life. And then I ask: Is this too many, too few or just right? What is "dangerous" is to ignore this fact, and to lack the curiosity or backbone to fully explore the science to understand — and, if necessary ameliorate — any negative consequences of this number for our youngest citizens.

Providing facts — drawn from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports and meticulously checked with the lead author of the federal "General Recommendations on Immunization" — is not, as Mr. Salzberg asserts, "fear-mongering" and "misinformation."

Rather, knowing this number is vital to ensuring that there is ongoing, rigorous biomedical research about childhood vaccines and the vaccine schedule. After all, more than 4 million U.S. children are born each year, and these federal recommendations apply to each and every one of them. These infants deserve more than reliance on a decade-old analysis of the ever-changing vaccine schedule, and name calling. Facts and data are, or should be, the way we have an informed populace, good science, sensible policies, and a strong democracy.

Mr. Salzberg asserts that the content of my op-ed "will lead parents to withhold vaccines from their children." My article does not say this. That is his conclusion, not mine.

Mr. Salzberg sets up a straw man, saying my "main claim is that the current vaccine schedule gives children too many vaccines too early in life, and that is somehow harmful to children." My article does not say that, either. Rather, it presents facts and asks questions, leaving readers to draw their own conclusions.

I do not know what Mr. Salzberg means when he says "science has debunked Ms. Dunkle's claims." What "claims" in my article is he talking about? Or perhaps he is speaking about issues on his agenda but not addressed by my article.

My op-ed cited the Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health study in the context that it is sure to rekindle the debate about vaccine safety. Mr. Salzberg's focus on this journal article confirms that indeed it has. I did not, however, as Mr. Salzberg contends, cite this article to support any "claims."

Mr. Salzberg is totally without accuracy when calls me an "anti-vaccine activist." Not true. Presenting solid facts about vaccines — 36 recommended doses before age 2 — provides information that can help improve our country's immunization efforts to ensure that children are both free from disease and free from adverse reactions to vaccination.

It is fine for Mr. Salzberg to have his own words and views. It is not fine for him to mischaracterize my words and views. I urge readers to read my actual article and draw their own conclusions.

Margaret Dunkle, Washington

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Vaccine safety: Misinformation about vaccine risks is making us less safe

    Vaccine safety: Misinformation about vaccine risks is making us less safe

    Last month, the Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene reported the first case of measles in the state since 2009.

  • Parents have good reason to distrust childhood vaccines

    Steven L. Salzberg's response to Margaret Dunkle's vaccination op-ed is itself a study in fear-mongering and ignorance ("Sun prints dangerous anti-vaccination op-ed," July 14). It is precisely because of the condescending and uninformed views of Dr. Salzberg that parents are losing confidence in...

  • Obama administration steps up on vaccines

    The Obama administration's recent commitment to the GAVI Alliance should be applauded ("Donors pledge $4.3 billion for vaccines for poor," June 13). The United States' pledge will help vaccinate 250 million children and save more than 4 million lives.

  • How to make another round of Baltimore riots inconceivable

    How to make another round of Baltimore riots inconceivable

    The July 27th page 1 article, "For some city youths, police camp builds relationship" explained "... how city and public safety leaders are trying to reach, teach and connect with children in ... Baltimore" through two police summer camps, Girls Expecting More Success (GEMS) and Gang Resistance...

  • Smog plan puts profits ahead of health

    Smog plan puts profits ahead of health

    According to the air-quality chief for Maryland Department of the Environment, Gov. Larry Hogan is trying to strike a "delicate balance" by letting coal plants supply Maryland residents with electricity and pollution ("New Hogan smog plan fails to satisfy power plants, environmentalists," July...

  • Even at pony swim, safety counts

    Even at pony swim, safety counts

    Apparently, safety issues are disregarded in the annual Chincoteague pony swim. In the photograph on The Sun's front page, the boat appears to be overloaded and no one is wearing a lifejacket ("Viewers brave muck, mosquitoes to see 90th Chincoteague Pony Swim," July 29).

Comments
Loading
82°