Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Court decision hurts workers and disabled [Letter]

The challenge and threat to the disabled, workers and public sector unions following the Supreme Court's decision in Harris v. Quinn ("Public unions at risk," July 1) is real. Yet again the court has taken action abridging protections afforded working people who have done so much to sustain what remains of our ever shrinking middle class. For years, labor unions have been under increasing pressure, and it is no coincidence that the decline in union membership across the private and public sectors has coincided with the greatest income inequality we've seen since the Great Depression.

That the court tempered its ruling by limiting its holding specifically to home health care workers who primarily serve elderly and disabled people is of dubious consolation. Maryland has derived great benefit from our home-care system as it exists inclusive of collective bargaining. By organizing together, home care workers have improved both their own working conditions and the quality of services provided.

A key point that I hope isn't lost in understanding this decision "narrowly" involves the threat to the independence and empowerment of people with disabilities. This opinion says that providing services in the home rather than in an institution and reserving hiring, firing and daily supervision power in the disabled person are what makes it unconstitutional to require personal assistants to defray collective bargaining costs. Collective bargaining is substantially impaired when unions cannot require workers who benefit from it to pay their share of the cost.

I am hoping that Maryland responds appropriately to shore up our collective bargaining regime. Doing nothing will likely result in an erosion of the stabilization of the personal assistance workforce that collective bargaining has provided. However, shoring up collective bargaining systems by turning to greater institutionalization and less consumer control is not the answer. Nothing, not even a Supreme Court decision, should stand in the way of home care workers having a strong voice for good jobs and quality home care for the disabled.

Rob Johnson, Windsor Mill

To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Public unions at risk [Editorial]
    Public unions at risk [Editorial]

    Our view: Court's decision on home health care workers invites more challenges to collective bargaining laws

  • Why no talk of Gray's disabilities?
    Why no talk of Gray's disabilities?

    According to what I've read, Freddie Gray was exposed to lead in early childhood. This resulted in neurological damage, developmental impacts and learning disabilities. Yet, I have seen no discussion of how disability issues factored into the tragic events surrounding Freddie Gray's death ("Six...

  • Baltimore's fateful choice
    Baltimore's fateful choice

    The police need to make a calculated decision on how to proceed regarding the unrest in Baltimore, given there are risks associated with whatever path they take ("After charges against officers, Hopkins' students call for continued protests, dialogue on Freddie Gray," May 1).

  • Violence is not the answer
    Violence is not the answer

    I wanted to write to voice my opinion on the events that led to the death of Freddie Gray along with the protests that turned violent in Baltimore. In police custody, Gray incurred a spinal injury that later resulted in his death. Watching the news coverage of the videos, it is not clear who is...

  • Mayor failed to acknowledge mistakes
    Mayor failed to acknowledge mistakes

    As a consequence of the recent Baltimore protests and riots, there has been a lot of discussion about the leadership qualities of Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake ("Who's in charge?" April 28). There is a fatal flaw in this debate. People are equating the quality of her leadership with decision-making....

  • City's leaders are too inexperienced
    City's leaders are too inexperienced

    I am a little taken aback by what is going on in Baltimore City the last few days. I see the problem as lack of leadership. Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake has no experience to deal with a situation of this magnitude ("Who's in charge?" April 28). The mayor wants to run the whole show, and she doesn't...

  • Young people are our future
    Young people are our future

    Regardless of our political affiliation it is difficult under the best of circumstances to raise children. We all want our children to become full functioning, well-educated citizens being productive for our families and society.

  • Reimer's hopelessness misplaced
    Reimer's hopelessness misplaced

    The headline "We have learned nothing" in Susan Reimer's column ("Baltimore takes center stage over Freddie Gray," April 30) says it all. Many of her insights about the cycle of poverty and violence are depressingly accurate — some of the incidents of looting and burning were on the exact same...