Get unlimited digital access to baltimoresun.com. $0.99 for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

Unions are not the answer

I take issue with much of Lane Windham's recent commentary ("If not labor unions, then what?" Jan. 29) beginning with the fundamental premise that it was the unions that provided us with economic redistribution. Like many other academicians, Ms. Windham confuses correlation with causation throughout her thought process. The simple presence of unions in the United States during our rise as the undisputed economic world leader does not establish them as the cause of a better or fairer distribution of wealth.

From 1947 to 1973, there are some other factors besides unions involved, not the least of which is the lack of any serious manufacturing competition throughout the entire world. Additionally, U.S. manufacturing capabilities were on steroids following World War II while other traditional manufacturing competitors were either devastated or in great disarray. Effectively, the world was clamoring for U.S. products and services while they were rebuilding their domestic production capabilities. These conditions gave the nation a tremendous base of both blue-collar and white-collar employment that resulted in the world's largest and most affluent middle class. Throughout this period, there never was a majority of unionized labor, yet somehow in spite of that, the world's largest middle class grew.

The writer also asserts that falling union membership caused an increase in the income divide. What is undoubtedly more significant is that since 1973 the U.S. started to lose much of its manufacturing advantage to foreign competition such as Japan and the upstart Asian economies.

The loss of manufacturing competitive advantage was due to higher wage and benefit costs and the lack of agility and flexibility due to rigid work rules negotiated by the unions. These challenges led to companies closing their non-competitive facilities, in many cases because they could not negotiate union concessions that would have led to improved productivity. Often, the union stance was they'd rather lose jobs than accept concessions on wages, benefits and work rules, and so they did. As these jobs disappeared, so did our middle class and a more even distribution of wealth.

It's probably true that America's citizens never got the kinds of universal health care programs, job insurance, or wage guarantees that benefited European workers, but they also haven't inherited the accompanying debt of these nations. It's also true that even today foreigners still prefer to immigrate to the U.S. than any other country in the world, and we still have people coming from all over the world to seek our medical services and skills. That being the case, I'm not sure why anyone would want to hold up the European socialist experience as desirous.

As to your closing question about what alternative to unions might temper the inequalities of the global economy, I suggest something she and others in academia just do not understand. To be a leader, even a survivor, in a global economy a country must be globally competitive and agile through constantly increased productivity. Only the creation of wealth through the transformation of natural resources into products of perceived value, and the provision of demanded services, provides economic redistribution. It seems to me that, as their membership roles suggest, the American working public is telling the unions that they do not believe they have the answer.

Michael P. Maturo, North Haven, Conn.

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
    Related Content
    • If not unions, then what?
      If not unions, then what?

      Membership in organized labor, a tremendous force for ensuring broad prosperity, is at a 93-year low

    • Pot is no harmless drug

      In response to the recent letter from Stan White of Dillon, Colo. ("Fight heroin by legalizing pot," March 3), I would point out that the disease of addiction is not drug-specific. I do agree with him that people who buy weed "on the streets" have a better than average opportunity to find...

    • The lessons of Ferguson

      The Justice Department on Wednesday released a devastating critique of police and city officials in Ferguson, Mo., where an unarmed black teenager was fatally shot by an officer last year. Though the department did not find cause to bring a civil rights indictment against the officer who killed...

    • Protecting the bay is a shared responsibility
      Protecting the bay is a shared responsibility

      I don't claim to know the details of Maryland's so-called "rain tax," but I do believe that improving the Chesapeake Bay is a responsibility all of us share ("Senators hear bid to repeal law requiring stormwater fees," March 3).

    • Don't allow Netanyahu to talk us into war
      Don't allow Netanyahu to talk us into war

      As an American, I'm outraged any foreign leader would come here and tell us what to do. By turning Washington into a "campaign stump," Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was offensive ("Netanyahu's speech," March 4). This is the United States of America, and we don't like being pushed...

    • Repeal ACA — and get single payer
      Repeal ACA — and get single payer

      Conservatives better hope Obamacare is not repealed ("Supreme Court takes up major fight with Obamacare subsidies," March 4) because if it is, we will be taking a giant step toward the (preferable, inevitable and much simpler and business friendly) Single Payer System!

    • Does free birth control encourage teen sex?
      Does free birth control encourage teen sex?

      Your recent article and subsequent editorial on the decrease in teen pregnancies brought a few questions to mind ("Teen pregnancies in Baltimore drop by a third," Feb. 24).

    • Stormwater remediation needs to happen at the source
      Stormwater remediation needs to happen at the source

      Property owners need to be responsible for their storm water discharge, not local government ("Senators hear bid to repeal law requiring stormwater fees," March 3).

    Comments
    Loading