Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Unions are not the answer

I take issue with much of Lane Windham's recent commentary ("If not labor unions, then what?" Jan. 29) beginning with the fundamental premise that it was the unions that provided us with economic redistribution. Like many other academicians, Ms. Windham confuses correlation with causation throughout her thought process. The simple presence of unions in the United States during our rise as the undisputed economic world leader does not establish them as the cause of a better or fairer distribution of wealth.

From 1947 to 1973, there are some other factors besides unions involved, not the least of which is the lack of any serious manufacturing competition throughout the entire world. Additionally, U.S. manufacturing capabilities were on steroids following World War II while other traditional manufacturing competitors were either devastated or in great disarray. Effectively, the world was clamoring for U.S. products and services while they were rebuilding their domestic production capabilities. These conditions gave the nation a tremendous base of both blue-collar and white-collar employment that resulted in the world's largest and most affluent middle class. Throughout this period, there never was a majority of unionized labor, yet somehow in spite of that, the world's largest middle class grew.

The writer also asserts that falling union membership caused an increase in the income divide. What is undoubtedly more significant is that since 1973 the U.S. started to lose much of its manufacturing advantage to foreign competition such as Japan and the upstart Asian economies.

The loss of manufacturing competitive advantage was due to higher wage and benefit costs and the lack of agility and flexibility due to rigid work rules negotiated by the unions. These challenges led to companies closing their non-competitive facilities, in many cases because they could not negotiate union concessions that would have led to improved productivity. Often, the union stance was they'd rather lose jobs than accept concessions on wages, benefits and work rules, and so they did. As these jobs disappeared, so did our middle class and a more even distribution of wealth.

It's probably true that America's citizens never got the kinds of universal health care programs, job insurance, or wage guarantees that benefited European workers, but they also haven't inherited the accompanying debt of these nations. It's also true that even today foreigners still prefer to immigrate to the U.S. than any other country in the world, and we still have people coming from all over the world to seek our medical services and skills. That being the case, I'm not sure why anyone would want to hold up the European socialist experience as desirous.

As to your closing question about what alternative to unions might temper the inequalities of the global economy, I suggest something she and others in academia just do not understand. To be a leader, even a survivor, in a global economy a country must be globally competitive and agile through constantly increased productivity. Only the creation of wealth through the transformation of natural resources into products of perceived value, and the provision of demanded services, provides economic redistribution. It seems to me that, as their membership roles suggest, the American working public is telling the unions that they do not believe they have the answer.

Michael P. Maturo, North Haven, Conn.

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
    Related Content
    • If not unions, then what?

      If not unions, then what?

      Membership in organized labor, a tremendous force for ensuring broad prosperity, is at a 93-year low

    • Homeless vets deserve better

      Homeless vets deserve better

      Surely Baltimore can be proud to host an event that raises money for veterans experiencing homelessness ("Charity race helps homeless vets," May 25). Yet the story includes two ironies. The larger one concerns the need for events such this race. Our political leaders are far more eager to risk...

    • Pre-K must be a higher priority

      Pre-K must be a higher priority

      Pre-kindergarten "gave the children a taste of what was coming," declares S. Sufrin, a kindergarten teacher at Arlington Elementary/Middle School in Northwest Baltimore. ("New assessments show half of Maryland's students ready for kindergarten," May 20)

    • Clean out City Hall

      Clean out City Hall

      Do any of those idiots working out of the mayor's office still believe that they are "in control" of Baltimore? Do they have any idea as to what is actually happening there? Are they for real ("Can Batts get the job done?" May 21)?

    • VA unfair to Merchant Mariners

      VA unfair to Merchant Mariners

      After reading your article "Unheralded heroes of the Merchant Marine" (May 23), I decided to add my two cents.

    • Pesticide threatens bee populations

      Pesticide threatens bee populations

      In response to your timely editorial "The endangered pollinators" (May 22), if you think you are buying bee-friendly plants, and the plant has been treated with a class of pesticides known as neonicotinoids — also called "neonics" — you are mistaken.

    • Fair housing — a job not done 56 years later

      Fair housing — a job not done 56 years later

      Thursday, May 28 marks the 56th Annual Meeting of Baltimore Neighborhoods, Inc. (BNI), one of the oldest fair housing agencies in the nation. The event will be highlighted by a keynote address from Maryland Attorney General Brian Frosh. BNI has been working for justice in housing since 1959. The...

    • Spate of shootings deserves protest

      Spate of shootings deserves protest

      Where are the protesters and politicians now ("Deadly month sees 35 killings," May 26)?

    Comments
    Loading

    72°