Summer Savings! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

Ultimate fighting is ultimately safe [Letter]

Letter writer Patrick Lynch and others with the same mindset ("UFC is borderline barbarism," April 29) should know that the UFC has been around since 1993 and there has yet to be a single death inside the Octagon or a fighter who has died due to their injuries from fighting in the Octagon. To the ill-informed, mixed martial arts is not a sport because it seems like fights like this happen every day on the streets and bars across the globe. My question is, what makes something a sport? A commonly accepted definition is "an activity involving physical exertion and skill in which an individual or team competes against another or others for entertainment to participants, and in some cases, spectators." Here's another definition which is commonly accepted: "an athletic activity requiring skill or physical prowess and often of a competitive nature." Does mixed martial arts not require physical exertion? Does it not require skill? Do participants not compete against one another with rules set in place? Are they not athletes? Or do men like Mr. Lynch and others simply dislike the fact that MMA and Ultimate Fighting Championship are different from what they are used to?

Yes, two men enter an enclosed cage and they fight until one man submits, gets knocked out or surrenders by tapping out or verbally submitting to the referee. OK, let's say that MMA is barbaric, archaic and dangerous as Mr. Lynch accuses it to be. Let's say one day there is a death in the UFC, which I agree with Mr. Lynch it is inevitable, but so what? What does that say about MMA and the UFC if one day a fighter dies in the Octagon or dies due to injuries said fighter sustained from a UFC sanctioned fight? Will that finally prove Mr. Lynch's point that it is barbaric and dangerous? If so, riddle me this: Has there even been a death in the NFL? Has there ever been an NFL player who died while preparing to play an NFL game? The answer to both is yes, so does that make the NFL barbaric? Should the game be condemned because these men died playing the game or even preparing for a season of football?

To find a sport more similar to MMA and the UFC, look no further than boxing where two combatants punch each other in the head and body until one can no longer stand. How is boxing any less "barbaric" than the UFC? In boxing, verbally submitting and quitting is seen as an act of cowardice so a man would rather take unnecessary punishment than admit defeat. In the UFC, the mindset is different — the athletes in the UFC are all OK with submitting to their opponents. Admitting defeat and verbally submitting is not seen as an act of cowardice and is not frowned upon like it is in boxing. Now looking at deaths, the UFC has been around for almost 21 years and there's yet to be a single death. Boxing sees numerous deaths per year. In fact, since 1920 until today, there have been over 900 boxers who have died (professional and amateur) due to injuries suffered in the ring, yet where is the outcry? In the U.S., from 1993 until 2011, there have been three deaths from injuries sustained in an MMA fight (not UFC sanctioned fights). That's an average of 0.17 deaths per year. Boxing in the U.S. averages 2.7 deaths per year — almost as many as MMA has since it's inception. Why is boxing not condemned and under the same scrutiny? In fact, John Hopkins University came out in 2006 with a study clearly stating that the sport of MMA was safer than boxing and no more dangerous than American football.

All one needs is an open mind to see that the UFC is as safe, if not more so, than any of the other popular male-dominated sports in the world such as boxing, NFL, soccer and so forth. While what Mr. Lynch wrote was simply his opinion, there is no shortage of evidence to contradict it.

Touhoua Yang

To respond to this letter, send an email to Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Baltimore needs BRT

    Baltimore needs BRT

    Recently, Lt. Gov. Boyd Rutherford announced that Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) should be considered as an alternative instead of the now-shelved Red Line light rail system ("Who knew Hogan, Rutherford were such transit geeks," July 15). Why? Costs. Light rail is extremely expensive — to the tune of...

  • Iran deal — war now or war later

    Iran deal — war now or war later

    In its recent editorial, The Sun adopts President Barack Obama's primary argument in favor of the Iran deal — that the only choice is the deal or war ("A 'good enough' agreement," July 24). No one wants war. But the choice here is not war or no war. It is war now or war later.

  • The evil of Iran

    The evil of Iran

    We sat 5,000-plus strong in the Walter E. Washington Convention Center in the District of Columbia for three intense days of Christians United For Israel (CUFI) 10th summit on July 12-14. We came from all across the nation (including 95 members from other countries and 500 college students). We...

  • Orioles: No gnomes, please

    Orioles: No gnomes, please

    In light of the Orioles recent near-death spiral, many fans have pinned the blame on the Buck Showalter Garden Gnome giveaway ("Buck Showalter garden gnome briefly causes long lines at Camden Yards," June 28). True, their record since the promotion has been dismal and Buck Showalter was warned...

  • Baltimore remains a fiber desert

    Baltimore remains a fiber desert

    Like Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake's Smarter Baltimore draft report, the commentary, "Broadband for Baltimore" (July 27), has solid recommendations for building high speed Internet in Baltimore. But like that report, it ignores the principal reason that Baltimore City doesn't have broadband. Verizon's...

  • Trump is the anti-politician

    Trump is the anti-politician

    Why are the press and both political parties so upset that Donald Trump is running for president ("The Trump lesson that Bush and Clinton should heed," July 27)? Could it be that he does not need someone else's money so the Democratic National Committee, GOP, George Soros or big business can't...