Summer Sale Extended! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

Tobacco tax is like speed cameras — a thinly-veiled money grab

Well, once again the editorial board at The Sun has jumped back in bed with Vincent DeMarco and his Maryland Citizens Health Initiative in supporting an additional $1 increase on Maryland's tax on cigarettes ("A life-saving tax," Nov. 26). As usual, we get the argument that hundreds of thousands of people die each year from smoking, and if we just raise that tax another dollar per pack, then people will finally kick the habit, etc. And let's not forget how the new higher price will discourage "the children" from smoking in the first place because we all know when they doubled the tax to $2 in 2007 virtually all the teenagers stopped smoking ( at least that's what they told us would happen back then).

Why, there's even a survey out that says 60 percent of Americans think higher taxes on cigarettes make sense to dissuade people from lighting up (although I wonder how many smokers were part of that survey).

Well, It's so nice to know that The Sun has my back and is looking out for me and the rest of the uninformed population of this state. That being said, I'm not an advocate of smoking. In fact, I don't smoke and have never smoked. I think it's a disgusting habit. But I find the hypocrisy of The Sun on this issue even more disturbing.

For the last two weeks, The Sun has been running a series on the speed camera program that has been highly critical of Baltimore City and Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake's loose interpretation of locations for the cameras, and I applaud you for pointing out the obvious money grab that these cameras represent in spite of all the phony-baloney reasons slithering out from City Hall.

Yet just when I think The Sun is starting to get some journalistic integrity, you go ahead and support this tax, which is same kind of money grab as the camera system, albeit with a different villain (evil smokers as opposed to evil speeders). If The Sun really cared about me and the rest of the unwashed masses, the board would push for a complete ban on smoking. But wait a minute, you can't do that because the state needs all that cigarette tax money for the budget. If we banned smoking, nobody would pay the tax.

So the real message is just go about your business, keep on smoking, and pay this new tax. Chances are there will be another $1 increase in five years — if you're still alive to pay it. Remember, it's for "the children."

Mark Wilson, Fallston

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Cigarette tax has saved lives; so would another raise in it

    Contrary to Marc Kilmer's letter ("Don't enable Md.'s addiction to cigarette tax revenue," Dec. 6), Maryland's 2007 dollar-per-pack cigarette tax increase significantly reduced teen smoking and saved lives. Between 2008 when the law took effect and the next time a survey of teen smoking was taken...

  • Don't enable Maryland's addiction to cigarette tax revenue

    We're almost a month away from another legislative session, so it was no surprise to read The Sun's editorial in favor of higher cigarette taxes ("A life-saving tax," Nov. 25). While lobbyists like Vinnie DeMarco prepare their annual push to punish smokers, the rationale to raise cigarette taxes...

  • Taxing cigarettes saves lives

    Taxing cigarettes saves lives

    Our view: Perhaps the single most effective public health intervention Maryland could take would be to increase the cigarette tax

  • Speed cameras save lives? Prove it

    Speed cameras save lives? Prove it

    I read the article about money machines (speed cameras) in Baltimore County, and there certainly are a number of different numbers associated with these money grabbers ("Is Baltimore County doubling its speed camera budget?" May 30). I use these term because I believe most people think speed cameras...

  • Annapolis and speed cameras

    Annapolis and speed cameras

    Isn't it amazing how the courts have found that speed cameras are a safety feature and not an un-mandated nuisance tax, yet The Sun finds the news in the loss of revenue instead of the great job they are doing in slowing down traffic and clogging up the streets of Annapolis with bumper to bumper...

  • Cameras and corruption

    Cameras and corruption

    I have followed The Sun's investigation of Baltimore's speed and red light cameras from the beginning and believe a desire for a back door tax is what is driving Baltimore's concern and not protecting the poor innocent school children they claim when defending the constitutionality of such laws...

  • Smaller is better

    Smaller is better

    A Baltimore City Council investigative committee looking into the city's problem-plagued speed- and red light-camera program has discovered what should have been obvious all along: That the now suspended system was far too big to be managed efficiently, that it was set up too quickly by the companies...

  • Speed cameras don't save lives

    Speed cameras don't save lives

    A recent editorial claimed "speed cameras are a powerful tool for saving lives" ("Safety first," June 3) but the supporting evidence, "a reduction in speed-related crashes — 29 percent from 2009 to 2012" is about crashes, not lives.