Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Use technology to prevent cellphone-related crashes

The front-page article by Pamela Wood about the prosecution of a young girl whose alleged texting while driving caused a fatal accident highlights a major failure by our elected leaders ("Crash fatality case could be Arundel first," Oct. 14). The article focuses on a 2011 change in the law that makes it easier to levy heavy fines and jail time for a person whose texting causes a fatal car accident. Prosecutors, defense attorneys and state legislators weigh in with opinions about the difficulty of proving this charge or that charge and the lack of justice for the victims' families when sometimes a $500 fine is the only consequence for taking someone's life.

Unfortunately, the prosecutors, state legislators and even the victims' families are completely missing the point. Stiffer penalties won't prevent these types of accidents and the tragic loss of life that too often results. Why not? Because most teenagers and even many early 20-somethings are just plain dumb, dumb, dumb! They can see horrendous tragedies all around them, sometimes even to close friends, and still think it can't happen to them. They think they are capable of texting and driving safely even though others are not. Of course, not all teenagers think this, but take a poll of parents of teenagers and you'll likely find overwhelming agreement. So the deterrent effect of these laws is minimal at best. Prosecutors may get more convictions bolstering their careers, legislators can campaign on a heartstrings issue and garner more votes, and victims' families may feel that justice is done, but in the end we've made criminals out of otherwise law-abiding young persons and we've prevented few if any deaths.

The only thing that can truly prevent these types of tragedies is disabling cell phones while a car is in motion. The technology already exists for smart phones, and no doubt could be developed for other phones as well. Legislators need only pass a law mandating the use of this technology. No doubt there will be some pain in implementing this statute. The technology would probably disable passengers' phones as well as the driver's, and it's possible that implementation would require some action by the phone service providers, which might cost consumers a bit of money. But this is small price to pay for the lives that would be saved.

For our legislators not to act when they have the means to save lives with a relatively small cost to the consumer would be the height of irresponsibility. They have passed laws making the use of phones while driving illegal, but the fact that they are virtually impossible to enforce renders them but a cruel joke. What's worse, the politicians had to know the laws were unenforceable even before they were passed. The only purpose of having the laws would seem to be to support prosecution after a tragedy has occurred. But this helps no one. Not the deceased and not the innocent young girl sitting in jail for three years.

The longer we go without a statute imposing a technological mechanism to enforce the laws prohibiting cell phone use while driving, the more innocent lives will be lost. The blood of every one of those lives is on the hands of our legislators for knowingly passing unenforceable laws when the means of enforcement was available to them. It's time for our legislators to "man up" and correct their fatal blunder.

Pat Hennessy, Woodbine

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Arundel texting crash highlights concerns with manslaughter law

    Arundel texting crash highlights concerns with manslaughter law

    One witness attests in police reports to seeing Elizabeth Meyers texting on her phone as she pulled into traffic on Route 3 in Gambrills. Cellphone records, according to authorities, show a phone call and three text messages between Meyers and her mother at that time.

  • Are looters going to jail?

    Are looters going to jail?

    I am wanting to know why I haven't read anything about the rioters being charged with the looting and burning of Baltimore. I understand that several hundred people were arrested but what has happened since?

  • Mayor needs a backbone

    Mayor needs a backbone

    Trying to eke out an existence in Baltimore has become a daily, even hourly, struggle for many. Oh, it was arduous enough before the recent spate of homicides occurred. But now it is simply a matter of good, law-abiding citizens of Baltimore being deprived of living in any semblance of peace ("Mother,...

  • Will Rodricks open his house to the poor?

    Will Rodricks open his house to the poor?

    In response to Dan Rodricks' proposal that our legislators support the leftist "Moving to Opportunity" agenda where the poor are moved to better neighborhoods through rent-subsidy vouchers, I have a better idea ("Time for leaders to do right thing for Baltimore's poorest kids," May 23).

  • Baltimore's death spiral

    Baltimore's death spiral

    Baltimore's mayor and state's attorney have taken the first steps to bankrupting this city. In addition to affirming obvious orders to allow space to destroy, the actions of the police make it clear that space was also provided for rioters to take control ("Baltimore needs an independent investigation...

  • Just obey the law and be respectful

    Just obey the law and be respectful

    If you cannot obey the law or teach your children to obey the laws of this country then why do you want the police to come to your aid? You call them your enemy and yet want their help in times of dire emergency. Get a grip on reality. If you want and desire their help, give them yours ("Officers...

  • Hubris of Baltimore 'plagues'

    Hubris of Baltimore 'plagues'

    Who is the Rev. James H. Bryant to invoke plagues on Baltimore? What kind of religious leader would dare to exhibit such hubris ("The 11th affliction," May 29)?

  • Let preschoolers be preschoolers

    Let preschoolers be preschoolers

    In the discussions about high quality pre-K and Common Core standards, it seems to me that we are missing something important ("Ready for Kindergarten?" May 23). We are so focused on preparing young children for the future and using them to fix societal problems that we are not paying attention...

Comments
Loading

61°