Summer Savings! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Anti-texting law: 'Hands free or pay the fee'

I read with interest your article "New texting fine in force today" (Oct. 1). But while the anti-texting law mandates stiff fines for violations, the law against cell phone use without a "hands free" device remains a secondary offense. The legislature should make it a primary offense as well, then enforce it vigorously.

It's amazing to see how many people are talking on their hand-held phones and what an annoyance and potential hazard they are. You know the ones: They're driving 50 mph in the fast lane on I-95, or not stopping at stop signs or, even more annoying, staying stopped at a stop sign until they finish talking. There's a whole new breed of drivers in Maryland who are holding their cell phone with one hand and gesturing with their other, apparently while steering their moving cars with their knees and/or feet!

The first few years after its passage, the mandatory seat belt law was widely ignored. Why do we now routinely buckle up? Because the law was not only enforced, it was also enforceable and there was an aggressive campaign to educate the public. Maryland drivers will routinely ignore the "hands free" cell phone law until (1) the Maryland legislature makes it a primary offense, and (2) it is enforced and memorably marketed — "Hands free or pay the fee."

Jared Garman, Havre de Grace

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • New laws go into effect Saturday

    Glancing at a text message or an e-mail from behind the wheel will cost $500 in fines starting Saturday, when a new law goes into effect clarifying Maryland's muddled driving-while-texting rules.

  • Iran deal falls woefully short

    Iran deal falls woefully short

    "Good enough" is not an acceptable alternative when it comes to making a nuclear deal with Iran, a government that consistently urges for "death to America and Israel" ("A 'good enough' deal," July 27). There are far too many questions left in this deal for Congress to accept it at this point in...

  • Iran deal threatens Israel

    Iran deal threatens Israel

    It is sad to see The Baltimore Sun's editorial board acknowledge its support for this awful deal with Iran ("A 'good enough' deal," July 27). War will not be the result if the deal is not signed, but at least the sanctions would still be in place. The only countries benefiting from this deal will...

  • Medicare deserves support

    Medicare deserves support

    Last Wednesday, Republican presidential candidate Jeb Bush said that we ought to phase out Medicare and that the nation needs to "move to a new system that allows them to have something, because they're not going to have anything." Mr. Bush also praised Rep. Paul Ryan, the architect of a long-term...

  • Eyedrops a flawed substitute for cataract surgery

    Eyedrops a flawed substitute for cataract surgery

    Every medical therapy must weigh both risks and benefits ("Genetics study points towards eyedrop cataract treatment," July 22). While eye drop therapy to treat cataracts sounds enticing, I am not sure its use is worth the potential development costs and risks.

  • Another mass shooting, and who's responsible?

    Another mass shooting, and who's responsible?

    I am a cinema buff, and I went to the Charles Theatre recently to see a wonderful film. While there I realized that another mentally ill person decided to vent his furies in a movie theater. This time in Lafayette, La. ("La. shooter a drifter with 'hate in his heart,'" July 25). This is the USA,...

  • Iran deal opponents seek war

    Iran deal opponents seek war

    The editorial, "A 'good enough' agreement" (July 24), correctly supports the nuclear deal between the West and Iran which will help to bring peace and stability to the Middle East, will bring both economic and political benefits to the U.S., and is supported by 60 percent of the American people....

  • Deinstitutionalization and the homeless

    Deinstitutionalization and the homeless

    Public-interest attorney Michael Millemann spearheaded a project in 1981 that removed 300 mentally disabled adults from institutions for the psychiatrically ill and found them appropriate placements.