Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Ehrlich's litmus test [Letter]

I enjoyed columnist Robert Ehrlich Jr.'s article on political affiliation and took his test ("Unsure of your affiliation? Take this test," Dec. 22).

Even though the Democrat side had more than the Republican side, "none of the above" was most apt, and this is exactly what is wrong with our current government.

Politicians want you to believe that everything is black and white and that you have to choose one or the other. I am a Democrat only because independents do not get to vote in Maryland primaries.

I have voted for the former governor every time he has run because he somehow convinced me he was more in the middle than his test choices.

I loved Ronald Reagan from his "Bedtime for Bonzo" and "Death Valley Days" movie career and voted for him the first time around. Once he became president, though, I found him remote and disconnected.

I always felt Mr. Reagan was a puppet figurehead that the Republicans used to conquer the White House and that conservatives were constantly whispering his lines into his ears. I failed to see the great Republican icon that they loved to make him.

I never bought into "trickle down" economics even though I understand the concept. Basically, it says the rich get richer now, and the poor get richer never.

Steven Davidson, New Windsor

-
To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • American values under Obama

    American values under Obama

    Two columns ago, I passed on a series of political observations from the heartland. Today, a snapshot of American values and viewpoints a decade and a half into the "new" millennium.

  • Ehrlich too negative, too partisan

    Ehrlich too negative, too partisan

    Robert L. Ehrlich Jr.'s cocky and aggressive partisanship make it evident why he couldn't govern effectively in Annapolis and was not re-elected for a second term ("Why Obama is viewed as weak," Nov. 30).

  • Ehrlich rants an embarrassment

    Ehrlich rants an embarrassment

    Not quite 10 years ago when I moved to Baltimore from a D.C. suburb, I made the decision to switch from The Washington Post to The Baltimore Sun for my daily news read. Ever since, I have had the paper delivered to my home on a daily basis. Even as it has gone down hill in content over that time....

  • Middle class value claims are a 'joke' [Commentary]

    Middle class value claims are a 'joke' [Commentary]

    It's the political season, which explains another column of "Things That Bug Me." Herewith my latest list for your consideration:

  • Respect the power of the pardon [Commentary]

    Respect the power of the pardon [Commentary]

    "[O]ne man appears to be a more eligible dispenser of the mercy of government, than a body of men."

  • Why Obama is viewed as weak

    Why Obama is viewed as weak

    Two recent Presidential pronouncements reflect the essential Barack Obama. Each also explains why so many view him to be the weakest of American presidents.

  • Unforced errors or tactical mistakes?

    Unforced errors or tactical mistakes?

    Political pundits like to label gratuitous political gaffes as "unforced errors" — mistakes that come out of right field without warning or reason.

  • Ehrlich's 'cult of anti-Obamaism'

    Ehrlich's 'cult of anti-Obamaism'

    Though I am 1960s retread boomer and unrepentant liberal who usually disagrees commentator Robert L. Ehrlich Jr., I read his column regularly. No surprise that he recently panned Obamacare — again — but what I never hear from Republicans is the Plan B, i.e., how we deal with the 40 million Americans...

Comments
Loading

75°