Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Students' attitudes toward school are shaped by what happens at home [Letter]

As a former Baltimore City schoolteacher I read with interest your story regarding workers' compensation for teachers injured by students ("Painful lessons: Run-ins with students take toll on teachers, city finances," Feb. 16).

While I was never injured myself, I broke up many a fight in my 6th- and 7th-grade classrooms, and there were occasions where I certainly felt concerned for my own safety confronting a particularly threatening student.

What I find especially appalling is the idea that a teacher, due to "ineffectiveness," is in any way responsible for the behavior of children who assault one another or staff members at school.

During my brief tenure as a BCPS teacher, the pressure was most certainly on teachers to "engage" their students and implement effective classroom management strategies. Administrators got very frustrated by teachers' repeated calls or referrals to the office.

Limiting suspensions of students was a very real pressure on school staff. While I recognize the importance of having a well-run, engaging classroom, I ask how a teacher is supposed to engage a child who comes to school with the attitude that education is not important and teachers or authority figures are to be ignored?

I often felt like I had to not just teach but also put on some sort of dog and pony show to simply get certain kids to even pay attention in class — never mind actually do any sort of work.

While there are certainly poorly trained, ineffective teachers in all levels of education, in no way is that an excuse for a child to act out in a violent manner. I had plenty of really lousy, boring teachers growing up and I don't remember ever witnessing a single fight in my classrooms.

I'm not talking about students with behavioral or emotional issues. I'm talking about kids who think the instructions of a teacher and the rules of the classroom are optional for them. These attitudes come straight from the home.

It is time for families and the community to step up and support the teachers who are on the front lines of dealing with kids for whom saving face, looking tough, and "payback" are the operating principles.

Not every kid is like this. Most kids want to learn. But they lose out as well when teachers have to constantly break up fights and deal with kids whose sole purpose appears to be disruption.

Teachers shouldn't have to worry about safety in their classrooms. I don't know how many times I would call a parent about student behavior to be greeted with silence or "that's not my problem," or "well, I can't deal with them either."

Yes, teachers need to be held accountable for a great many things. But how about holding students and parents accountable for attitudes and behaviors that end up causing repercussions far beyond the classroom? We must make a way to create safe, dynamic learning environments for students and school staff alike.

Jennifer Hamilton, Sykesville

-
To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Food for thought about school lunches

    Food for thought about school lunches

    Regarding Anita Heygstrom's recent letter about school lunches, what she doesn't seem to get is that children who come to school with empty stomachs tend not to learn very well, if at all ("Children shouldn't be hungry, but parents shouldn't expect handouts," June 9).

  • No more empty stomachs in class

    No more empty stomachs in class

    Children who are hungry have a hard time learning regardless of their innate ability or their desire to keep up with their classmates. That's why the Baltimore City school system's announcement that, starting this month, every student in the city will receive free breakfast and lunch at school...

  • Well-trained teachers are an asset to city [Letter]

    Well-trained teachers are an asset to city [Letter]

    Many thanks to reporter Liz Bowie for taking a close look at how Urban Teacher Center prepares new teachers to serve our local schools more effectively ("Residency program tries to solve problem of teacher burnout," Aug. 18).

  • City Council: All bark but no bite on school layoffs

    City Council: All bark but no bite on school layoffs

    Some members of the Baltimore City Council are fuming over city schools CEO Gregory Thornton's handling of layoffs within the system and have decided to hold up the school budget for at least a few days over their concerns. And while there may be some legitimate questions here, we have to wonder...

  • Dumping books? Baltimore can't afford that

    Dumping books? Baltimore can't afford that

    Throwing books away ("Books suffer purge at Heritage," June 17)? What an abdication of North Avenue leadership. What absolute stupidity to throw away books. There was not enough time or energy to figure out something better than a dumpster?

  • What makes a school desirable? Location, location, location

    What makes a school desirable? Location, location, location

    Why are parents trying to get their children in more affluent schools like Mt. Washington, Roland Park and Dumbarton? What do these schools have that schools in Sandtown-Winchester, Ashburton and Violetville don't have?

Comments
Loading

84°