Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99
News Opinion Readers Respond

Sun has it wrong on teacher pensions, Worcester County

I am responding to your recent editorial titled, "Equity for pensions" (Jan. 9).

The editorial asserts that Maryland should transfer the costs of teacher pensions from the state to its 24 local jurisdictions. As a rationale, the editorial argues that the current funding formula gives money to rich school systems while not supporting poor school systems. The premise of the editorial is that school systems which have higher teacher pay should have their local governments pay the price of higher pension contributions. The editorial uses Worcester County Public Schools as an example of a high paying and wealthy school system without checking the facts.

In the case of Worcester County Public Schools, for our operating budget, we receive the second lowest amount of state aid in Maryland. We serve a diverse, rural student population, with 41 percent of our students residing in households of poverty. In addition, currently, Worcester County has a 16 percent unemployment rate and one of the lowest median household incomes in Maryland. While we have a high poverty rate, our state test scores consistently rank at the top of the state. We have eliminated the achievement gap at the elementary school level and have significantly closed the gap at the middle and high school levels. We have one of the highest on-time graduation rates and one of the lowest drop-out rates in Maryland.

One of the reasons our school system is so successful is our initiative to reduce class sizes. By having some of the smallest class sizes in Maryland, we can give students the individual attention that they need. Small class sizes and initiatives, such as a collaborative teaching model which pairs special education teachers and classroom teachers in the same classroom to co-teach students, means that we must hire more teachers. Also, we hire additional school psychologists, as well as speech, occupational and physical therapists to reduce case loads. This highly effective strategy does increase overall costs for the salary budget category, but it works.

The editorial erroneously assumes that Worcester County teacher salaries are disproportionally higher than those in other Maryland school systems. Our salary costs in Worcester County Public Schools are not driven by higher teacher salaries but instead by our desire to provide targeted individual instruction to students. In other words, we may have more teachers on a per-student basis, but they are not receiving higher teaching salaries. When compared to other teachers in Maryland, our starting salary ranks 15th in the state, out of 24 Maryland school systems. In fact, Worcester County teacher salary ranking in Maryland has been declining and not increasing as implied in the editorial.

The characterization of our school system in The Baltimore Sun is wrong. In Worcester County, we have dedicated teachers who are making sure that our children are learning and growing. Due to the efforts of our teachers, our students are succeeding. Because our teachers are committed to our students' success, they have sacrificed to keep our class sizes small. For the last three years, our teachers agreed to go without a pay raise to help our county and school system deal with our weak economy.

The potential transfer of teacher pension costs will punish school systems across the state but especially those school systems like ours which have reduced class size and provided the number of special education teachers and services needed to provide high-quality educational services for all students. If the teacher pension costs are transferred to our local government and passed on to our school system, the quality of our top-performing educational program will be severely challenged like never before.

For over 30 years, I have been reading the Baltimore Sun. Usually, the Sun, prior to offering an opinion on the editorial page, will do its homework by researching, conducting interviews and publishing articles about a specific matter. In this case, The Sun failed to contact our school system for comment or response.

If the editor or reporter who wrote the editorial had simply taken the time to contact me for comment, I could have helped the individual share a more accurate story with the public. Perhaps the editorial title might have been changed to: "A lesson in school system success — Our view: Keeping class sizes small is the best investment of taxpayer dollars and positively affects the economic development of our entire state. Thank you, teachers!" In the future, I would encourage The Sun to do its homework.

Jon M. Andes, Newark

The writer is Worcester County superintendent of schools.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • The downside of China's 'thriving' economy
    The downside of China's 'thriving' economy

    Like many individuals and corporations, Charles Campbell equates success with money ("Why China is passing us up," March 25).

  • Supergirl for the modern era
    Supergirl for the modern era

    Great news that comic book publishers will be adding to the existing line-up of female superheroes ("Supergirl power," March 27)!

  • Maryland needs renewable energy
    Maryland needs renewable energy

    The first day of spring ironically delivered another snowstorm in Maryland ("Before spring, snow threatens Baltimore once more," March 19). Fluke weather patterns are expected to become more severe as climate change persists. The extreme shifts from warm sunny days to cold, wintry ones takes...

  • BCCC is adapting to boost students' job prospects

    Like the Baltimore Sun, Baltimore City Community College (BCCC) commends the Abell Foundation for its recently released examination of why so few city high school graduates pursue employment opportunities in high-demand jobs that don't require a four-year college degree ("Tickets to success,"...

  • Exchange still doing its job
    Exchange still doing its job

    Deep in The Sun's article about the Maryland Health Benefit Exchange's use of federal money ("Health signup billing faulted," March 27), is the terrific fact that the uninsured rate in Maryland has dropped from 12.9 percent to 7.3 percent thanks to the Affordable Care Act.

  • Business as usual on Obamacare exchange audit
    Business as usual on Obamacare exchange audit

    Regarding your story that Maryland overbilled the U.S. through its insurance exchange ("Audit says Maryland overbilled federal government $28.4M in health exchange launch," March 27) what else is new?