Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
NewsOpinionReaders Respond

The incredibly forgetful Mr. Rodricks

Democratic PartyGeorge W. BushTea Party MovementElections

I am a moderate and like to hear both sides of a story. I agree with Dan Rodricks that many people have made excessive money through legal but less than ethical means. I would favor an increased tax of 50 percent on those who make excessive salaries. That bracket would start at $2 million, not $200,000.

But in Mr. Rodricks' recent column ("Question for tea party: What now?" Aug. 4), he once again only gives half the facts to support his liberal views. He considers the current members of Congress who want to stop the obscene spending and balance the budget to be extreme. He blames our debt on President George W. Bush, but does not mention that the Democrats had control of both branches of Congress from January 2007 to January 2011.

That was the time when our country went downhill and the debt increased dramatically. Since Congress originates all spending bills, the Democrats did all the spending during the last three years of the Bush administration. That is the part that Mr. Rodricks forgot.

Stanley J. Glinka, Ellicott City

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
Democratic PartyGeorge W. BushTea Party MovementElections
  • Schaller fails to see danger of U.S. debt

    Columnist Thomas F. Schaller's analysis is incredibly myopic ("Avoiding Europe's austerity nightmare," April 18). To compare the economic condition of the U.S. to those of Greece or Spain at the beginning of the economic crisis is comparing apples and oranges.

  • Military spending is misplaced U.S. priority

    On April 17, I will be protesting war taxes at Baltimore's main post office. I realize that taxes fund many good programs — education, environment and diplomacy. But sadly when 57 percent of the federal budget goes to the Pentagon, the government's priorities are out of touch...

  • A better budget remedy than the Buffett rule

    You end your editorial on the Buffett Rule ("The Buffett Rule backlash," April 13) with the question, "Where will the $50 billion come from to balance the budget, if not from this minimum tax plan?"

  • Skeptical of Buffett and need for higher taxes

    First, I'm an 80-year-old living on Social Security, and I know all the tax loopholes need to be closed ("The Buffett Rule backlash," April 13). But isn't it correct that Warren Buffett owes the IRS a great deal of taxes for a number of years? Let's have a true...

  • The Buffett Rule backlash
    The Buffett Rule backlash

    Our view: Taxing the wealthy at rates others already face wouldn't solve the nation's deficit, but it would restore a modicum of fairness to the tax code

  • Godless Republicans turn back on poor and sick

    Some churchmen take exception to some of President Barack Obama's positions on matters of faith. I suggest these men of faith take a closer look at the true meaning of religion. All three Abrahamic religions — Christianity, Judaism and Islam — have as their central theme the...

Comments
Loading