Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. $12 for 12 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

Settle Syria dispute without missiles

The debate on Syria is much too limited ("Syrian rebels ready to strike if U.S. does," Sept. 6). It should not be about military effectiveness, national interest, or building coalitions. The more relevant question is why, after 6,000 years of civilization with extraordinary advances in technology, human rights, education, health and quality of life, when another nation acts badly the best we can come up with is to drop explosives on him?

Really? We are back to the Stone Age and only the sophistication of the weapons has changed. Then it was clubs, now cruise missiles. If it happens, it is not just on Barack Obama. It is on all of us.

Jerry T. Lawler, Baltimore

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Mission accomplished [Editorial]
    Mission accomplished [Editorial]

    Our view: The destruction of Syria's chemical weapons stocks has made the whole world a safer place

  • Syrian chemical weapons may linger [Letter]
    Syrian chemical weapons may linger [Letter]

    Are The Sun's editors naive enough to really believe that the last of Syrian chemical weapons have been turned over ("Muscular diplomacy," June 26)? I think that in the haste to find something to praise President Barack Obama for, you may again find egg on your editorial page. Remember the "red...

Comments
Loading