Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

Syria is no threat to the U.S.

The U.S. has no business bombing Syria; that country is no threat to us ("The decisive moment," Sept. 9).

What happened to its citizens was horrendous, but it is uncertain who exactly released poison gas. Even if it were positively certain that Syrian President Bashar Assad was responsible, an attack by the U.S. is too dangerous to carry out.

The region is so unstable that the result of an attack could be catastrophic. Armageddon could ensue.

What we should do is strongly condemn Mr. Assad and leave him to the rest of the world to deal with. If and when he threatens this country directly, then we should not hesitate to respond militarily.

Mary Kollner, Baltimore

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Mission accomplished [Editorial]
    Mission accomplished [Editorial]

    Our view: The destruction of Syria's chemical weapons stocks has made the whole world a safer place

  • Syrian chemical weapons may linger [Letter]
    Syrian chemical weapons may linger [Letter]

    Are The Sun's editors naive enough to really believe that the last of Syrian chemical weapons have been turned over ("Muscular diplomacy," June 26)? I think that in the haste to find something to praise President Barack Obama for, you may again find egg on your editorial page. Remember the "red...