Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

We can't cut school suspensions without funding alternatives [Letter]

Teachers and administrators do not like suspending students. It is always a balancing act trying to weigh the interests of the larger student body vs. that of the individual student ("The folly of pre-K suspensions," Nov. 12). That said, criticism of suspensions with no mention of funding "in-school" interventions represents the height of hypocrisy.

Most of the children involved in violent behaviors need love and support, which will rarely be found in a suspension. Schools need to create internal programs and alternative curricula for many, many of these children, but there is no money to do so. Thus, schools are left with one tool to deal with highly-disruptive, often violent students: suspension. Until the larger society recognizes the seriousness of our needs and funds those needs, teachers don't want to read self-righteous, finger-pointing, hand-wringing lectures.

Tom Smith, Baltimore

The writer is a teacher at Patterson High School.

To respond to this letter, send an email to Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Expanded pre-K will help Maryland's children [Letter]

    Expanded pre-K will help Maryland's children [Letter]

    Columnist Dan Rodricks rightly asks what all the celebrating is about regarding the accomplishments of the 2014 Maryland General Assembly ("Underwhelmed by the Md. legislature," April 9). He also calls the $4.3 million allocated this year for expanded pre-kindergarten education in our state "paltry."

  • Pre-K must be a higher priority

    Pre-K must be a higher priority

    Pre-kindergarten "gave the children a taste of what was coming," declares S. Sufrin, a kindergarten teacher at Arlington Elementary/Middle School in Northwest Baltimore. ("New assessments show half of Maryland's students ready for kindergarten," May 20)