Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

The high court's dangerous positions

Dan Rodricks' recent column ("Justice Breyer, the supreme explainer," Oct. 13) points to a historically important incident which exposes the real danger inherent in the Supreme Court's decision-making power, politically speaking.

In the Bush v. Gore decision in 2000, the Supreme Court handed George W. Bush the presidential election on a 5-4, politically driven vote by the court to stop the recount in Florida. Today, all the Republican Party needs to do, it seems, is sweep in the money afforded them by the Supreme Court's Citizens United ruling to make good on Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell's promise "to make Obama a one-term president."

I am one who cannot bear the thought of a return to the Bush/Cheney administration's disastrous eight years during which the Clinton budget surplus was turned into the present economic swamp (in large part due to the illegal war in Iraq, predicated on non-existent weapons of mass destruction).

President Barack Obama, on the other hand, won his overwhelming grassroots election in 2008 honestly and continues to stand by his conviction that a healthy government must have true bipartisan Congressional rule of law, while Republicans, egged on by tea party extremists, exploit their "my way or the highway" steamroller agenda.

Democrats must not simply ignore Republican charges of playing a "blame game" by reminding voters of the George W. Bush years but continue to tell it as it is with the indisputable authority of history.

The Supreme Court must abstain from politically tainted views if it is to be trusted at all. In the long run, history will expose the truth as it was and is.

Elizabeth Goldsborough, Owings Mills

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • In Westboro Baptist case, court upheld the law

    In Raymond Novak's op-ed piece on the Supreme Court decision in the Snyder v. Phelps First Amendment case, he utterly misstates the 8-1 opinion issued by the court ("Juries on trial," Oct. 6). Mr. Novak claims that "the court found that the evidence was more than sufficient to support [Albert Snyder's]...

  • Court's First Amendment views are variable

    I sympathize with letter writer Arthur Lapenotiere ("In Westboro Baptist case, court upheld the law," Oct. 10), who wrote this in defense of the Supreme Court's ruling, quoting from Justice William J. Brennan, "If there is a bedrock principle underlying the First Amendment, it is that government...

  • Get rid of bad cops
    Get rid of bad cops

    It's a sickening, recurring pattern in Baltimore: A citizen is arrested and while transporting the so-called suspect to the police precinct for booking, he gets the stuffing beat out of him. To further rub salt in the wound, the cops are ultimately exonerated from any wrongdoing ("Investigation...

  • Ignorance on immigration
    Ignorance on immigration

    Republicans have written to your newspaper claiming that President Barack Obama, former Gov. Martin O'Malley and other Democratic elected officials are trying to "give voting rights to millions of undocumented immigrants who came here illegally and don't belong in this country in the first place"...

  • Aid agencies sow seeds of hope
    Aid agencies sow seeds of hope

    I read the your report "Fierce clashes in Iraq as Islamic State seizes villages near Ramadi" (April 15) with a mixture of sadness, fear and exasperation.

  • MRIs for pets aren't so novel
    MRIs for pets aren't so novel

    I read your recent article about magnetic resonance imaging of pets at Johns Hopkins with great interest ("Johns Hopkins begins using high-tech equipment on pets," April 7).

  • How can Hillary Clinton be a champion of the middle class when she's part of the 1 percent?
    How can Hillary Clinton be a champion of the middle class when she's part of the 1 percent?

    Presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton says there is something wrong when CEOs make 300 times more than the typical worker. I can't help but wonder why she doesn't feel there isn't something wrong with making $300,000 for one speech.

  • NRA's paranoia is catching
    NRA's paranoia is catching

    The Sun's editorial reflecting on the National Rifle Association convention in Nashville is an important statement on how the NRA has devalued our lives and our society ("Guns and the 'permanent darkness,'" April 16).

Comments
Loading

70°