Summer Sale! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

Supercommittee restores our lack of faith in government

I read with great interest that the supercommittee isn't quite sure they will be able to reach agreement on their assignment to find a deficit reduction package that will put this country back on the road to financial responsibility. What they might do is agree on is an outline of smaller concessions and defer the most difficult decisions until after the 2012 elections. This, of course, comes as no surprise to most Americans who have little faith in the ability of our elected officials to make bipartisan decisions for the good of the country instead of "kicking the can down the road" for someone else to deal with. That will give them more time to work on their primary goal of being reelected.

What these politicians fail to realize is that the largest sector of the electorate resides somewhere near center rather the far left or the far right, and we vote that way. The American public expects to be governed in a way that reflects common sense and compromise rather than political partisanship. The political fringe elements don't decide elections; it is the vast majority of voters near the center in their beliefs who do. History has demonstrated that Americans use the voting booth when government moves too far to the right or left. At this point, we do not have the option of a "no confidence" vote in our elected officials. So we must use the system in place.

In this case, we expect our elected representatives to come up with a balance of spending reductions and revenue increases that puts the nation first. I think most Americans are willing to do their part to avoid a complete financial crisis. However, they expect everyone to share in the pain. The supercommittee and Congress have a difficult job to do. If they don't, they should be fired on the spot just like the rest of us if we failed to do our jobs. Perhaps the threat of being fired on the spot with no pensions or benefit packages would be incentive enough for the supercommittee to complete their assignment.

Fred Ludwig, Columbia

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Schaller fails to see danger of U.S. debt

    Columnist Thomas F. Schaller's analysis is incredibly myopic ("Avoiding Europe's austerity nightmare," April 18). To compare the economic condition of the U.S. to those of Greece or Spain at the beginning of the economic crisis is comparing apples and oranges.

  • Military spending is misplaced U.S. priority

    On April 17, I will be protesting war taxes at Baltimore's main post office. I realize that taxes fund many good programs — education, environment and diplomacy. But sadly when 57 percent of the federal budget goes to the Pentagon, the government's priorities are out of touch with the pressing...

  • A better budget remedy than the Buffett rule

    You end your editorial on the Buffett Rule ("The Buffett Rule backlash," April 13) with the question, "Where will the $50 billion come from to balance the budget, if not from this minimum tax plan?"

  • Skeptical of Buffett and need for higher taxes

    First, I'm an 80-year-old living on Social Security, and I know all the tax loopholes need to be closed ("The Buffett Rule backlash," April 13). But isn't it correct that Warren Buffett owes the IRS a great deal of taxes for a number of years? Let's have a true picture of Mr. Buffett.

  • The Buffett Rule backlash

    The Buffett Rule backlash

    Our view: Taxing the wealthy at rates others already face wouldn't solve the nation's deficit, but it would restore a modicum of fairness to the tax code

  • Godless Republicans turn back on poor and sick

    Some churchmen take exception to some of President Barack Obama's positions on matters of faith. I suggest these men of faith take a closer look at the true meaning of religion. All three Abrahamic religions — Christianity, Judaism and Islam — have as their central theme the commandments to protect...