Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99
News Opinion Readers Respond

After stun guns, legalized bazookas?

Now that Anne Arundel County Executive Laura Neuman has declared the possession of stun guns to be "clearly protected by the Second Amendment" (in an interview with WBAL Radio), we must consider other weapons that should be protected constitutionally. Grenades, improvised explosive devices, hand-held missiles, and, of course, tactical nuclear devices are surely protected as "arms" by the Second Amendment because we need the ability to protect ourselves from an oppressive government which already has all of these resources. The Founders knew!

Let us pass or repeal the necessary laws and forget the foolishness of subjecting any challenges to the process of judicial review. The Founders were asleep at the switch on that one. And to paraphrase Wayne LaPierre and the late Charlton Heston, I'll give up my bazooka when you pry it from my cold, dead hands.

Art Lapenotiere, Westminster

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
    Related Content
    • Hogan, guns and the attorneys general
      Hogan, guns and the attorneys general

      During the recent gubernatorial campaign, The Sun and several thoughtful citizens were perplexed about the discrepancy between the National Rifle Association's notorious A- rating for Larry Hogan and the candidate's repeated promise that he won't overturn Maryland's gun law if elected. In fact,...

    • Maryland's gun law is working
      Maryland's gun law is working

      The gun lobby's lawsuit against Maryland's life-saving Firearm Safety Act described in Saturday's front page article does not challenge the constitutionality of the key provision of the act — requiring handgun purchasers to first obtain a fingerprint based background check and license...

    Comments
    Loading