Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

Marylanders are struggling under the state's constant tax and fee increases

Your recent editorial on stormwater fees made me burst out laughing with tears streaming from my eyes — hopefully, liquid that will not one day to be considered taxable run-off ("The rain tax sham," April 18).

You opine that "we think it's far more sensible to expect polluters to clean up after themselves — and in this case, that means all of us." In response to that statement, I couldn't help but think of the Sunday morning televangelist shouting at us "repent, you nasty polluters, repent!"

You may feel free to wrap yourselves in self-flagellation, but don't drag me under your repressed umbrella. It is water coming from the sky and has been for millions of years.

The fact that one owns a home or, even worse, is one of those dreaded business owners with a parking lot, can only mean they need to be yoked with more taxes.

The charade is that money from this tax will be used to finance "a dedicated fund that goes directly to cleaning up a problem." Just like money in the state's Transportation Trust Fund has only been used for transportation projects?

But why more taxes at all? Were we not led to believe the increase in the sales tax several years ago, the 2011 increases in the bridge and tunnel tolls, the alcohol tax, the 2012 doubling of the "flush tax," the increase in the tobacco tax and the coming hike in the gas tax and vehicle registration fees were all to be Maryland's saviors?

With its constant over-reliance on taxes and gambling, the political leadership in Maryland has proven once again it lacks the competency to build a long-term strategy for true economic growth. Is it moving Maryland forward? I think not.

Stuart Entwistle, Towson

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
    Related Content
    • 'Rain tax' not optional
      'Rain tax' not optional

      The recent sub-headline on the editorial regarding the "rain tax" was patently false ("The bogus 'rain tax' repeal," Nov. 23).

    • Rain tax exemption not worth the effort
      Rain tax exemption not worth the effort

      When we built our house in Anne Arundel County in 2002, we had to install a $10,000 wastewater management system because we were building within 1,000 feet of a body of water. We found this to be unreasonable but we had no appeal. We were certain that we qualified for an exemption now from...

    • Faulty 'rain tax' math
      Faulty 'rain tax' math

      The facts in your recent editorial about the so-called "rain tax" are very selective ("The bogus 'rain tax' repeal," Nov. 21).

    • Sun ignores real cost of 'rain tax'
      Sun ignores real cost of 'rain tax'

      As usual, The Sun gets it wrong on the real cost to homeowners of the "rain tax" ("The bogus 'rain tax' repeal," Nov. 24). According to the Sun's editorial board, the tax only costs about $39 a year for the typical Baltimore County homeowner. No big deal, right? Well, how about the residual...

    • The bogus 'rain tax' repeal
      The bogus 'rain tax' repeal

      Despite facing a bigger-than-expected budget shortfall, and although he promised a policy blackout until he takes office, Governor-elect Larry Hogan last week publicly reiterated his support for repealing Maryland's "rain tax" while meeting with fellow Republican governors in Florida. He told...

    • On 'rain tax,' Hogan has the right idea
      On 'rain tax,' Hogan has the right idea

      The Sun really doesn't get it! Larry Hogan is "repealing" the "rain tax" because it is emblematic of the over-taxing of our state's residents ("The bogus 'rain tax' repeal," Nov. 24). You can engage in all the legalistic finger-wagging you care to, but the people of this state are not impressed...

    • In rush to cut taxes and fees, lawmakers are sacrificing long-term environmental sustainability
      In rush to cut taxes and fees, lawmakers are sacrificing long-term environmental sustainability

      I was disheartened to read that both Republican and Democratic legislators are already making plans to repeal the stormwater management fees designed to pay for projects that mitigate the only source of Chesapeake Bay pollution that is still on the rise ("After Hogan victory, local...

    • Time to flush the 'rain tax'
      Time to flush the 'rain tax'

      The Baltimore Sun editorial ("Bogus rain tax repeal," Nov. 24) neglects to mention that in passing the House Bill 987 Stormwater Management-Watershed and Restoration Program, the "rain tax" in response to the 2010 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency mandate aimed at reducing the pollution...

    Comments
    Loading