Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

Packing heat with your hot coffee

As a member of Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America, I am shocked and confused over why Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz recently banned smoking within 25 feet of the company's coffee shops but continues to allow customers to carry loaded weapons inside. Unlike its competitors, Starbucks allows customers to bring loaded guns in stores in states that allow firearms to be carried openly.

I do not want to unknowingly expose my children to loaded weapons when I purchase coffee. There have been several shootings at Starbucks around the country recently, and I want to prevent this from happening in my community.

I am asking Mr. Schultz to institute corporate policies that promote a common-sense approach to protecting children and families from the growing epidemic of gun violence. As a valued community citizen, Starbucks could play an important role in addressing this crisis by immediately banning loaded guns from its stores.

Gun violence is not just a legislative issue: Companies and businesses can help create a culture that values gun safety. By instituting a policy banning guns in its stores, Starbucks would make a crucial statement about how much it values the safety of its customers.

Women oversee nearly 80 percent of household spending decisions. Moms Demand Action is helping them make sure they spend those dollars at businesses that respect and support the safety of their families. We will not rest until real gun reform takes place in America's businesses and legislatures.

Lisa Otterstrom

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Maryland's gun law is working
    Maryland's gun law is working

    The gun lobby's lawsuit against Maryland's life-saving Firearm Safety Act described in Saturday's front page article does not challenge the constitutionality of the key provision of the act — requiring handgun purchasers to first obtain a fingerprint based background check and license...

  • Md. gun law is working [Letter]
    Md. gun law is working [Letter]

    Jack Mccauley's letter belittling the Firearms Safety Act fails to mention the most important parts of the new law — the requirement that handgun purchasers get a fingerprint-based license and the authority for the state police to regulate firearms dealers ("O'Malley, Brown are kidding...

  • Gun law doesn't make Marylanders safer [Letter]
    Gun law doesn't make Marylanders safer [Letter]

    Lt. Gov. Anthony Brown's recent commentary on Maryland's 2013 Firearms Safety Act is disingenuous and deceitful ("Brown: I will enforce gun safety law," Oct. 2).

  • A wasteful death by Uzi [Letter]

    Though I seriously doubt it, I wonder if a gun advocate or a member of National Rifle Association could explain to me why a 9-year-old girl needs weapons training ("An Uzi, a 9-year-old and American exceptionalism," Aug. 31). When I first read about the 9-year-old girl who had accidentally...

  • The city's problem isn't guns, it's gangs [Letter]
    The city's problem isn't guns, it's gangs [Letter]

    While I agree with letter writer Pat Ranney that Baltimore has a serious gun violence problem, she is incorrectly placing blame on an inanimate object. Guns don't pull the trigger, people do ("Baltimore's violence won't end until we stand up to the gun lobby," Aug. 14).

  • Judge's decision on Md. assault weapons ban makes no one safer [Letter]
    Judge's decision on Md. assault weapons ban makes no one safer [Letter]

    U.S. District Judge Catherine Blake's decision upholding Maryland's assault weapons ban isn't a victory for anyone ("A victory for public safety," Aug. 14).

Comments
Loading