Get unlimited digital access to $0.99 for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

Mencken would have denounced speed cameras

After having read your editorial supporting Maryland's red light and speed cameras, I am forced to wonder how you, as journalistic heirs to the great H. L. Mencken, have so completely lost touch with the basic realities of the contemporary world ("The purpose of speed cameras," Dec. 27).

These devices have nothing whatever to do with any type of road safety. They were brought to us by a cadre of manipulative, lying, thieving politicians who were too cowardly to openly raise taxes yet desperate for revenue.

It constitutes a deliberate fraud and a polite robbery of the state's citizens. Your own paper has exposed such embarrassments as the shortening of yellow light intervals order to generate more tickets.

Those who disagree should consider this: If, for instance, there were a federal law mandating that all revenues from state or municipal speed cameras had to be turned over to charity instead of to government, do you honestly think there would be a single such device left operating in the entire country?

Drage Vukcevich, Gwynn Oak

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Cameras and corruption
    Cameras and corruption

    I have followed The Sun's investigation of Baltimore's speed and red light cameras from the beginning and believe a desire for a back door tax is what is driving Baltimore's concern and not protecting the poor innocent school children they claim when defending the constitutionality of such laws...

  • Safety or revenue?
    Safety or revenue?

    Before it was shut down over reports of widespread errors, Baltimore ran by far the largest speed camera program in the state and one of the largest in the nation. It generated a lot of tickets and a lot of revenue for the city — so much so that officials were fighting over what to do...