Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. $12 for 12 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

Speed cameras are all about revenues, not safety [Letter]

Despite all the talk about the city's speed camera program, one key point has been missing: We don't want them ("Mayor pledges new, smaller speed camera system," Dec. 18).

It's not about whether the speed camera's are accurate (although they better be). Nor is it about how many cameras there are or where they are placed (although the fewer the better, and only near actual schools would be preferable).

The point is that the city ought to be making it easier to live here, not harder. It should aim to make our lives better, not burden us with annoying tickets.

If there were strong data that speed cameras actually made Baltimore's pedestrians safer, we might not hate them so much. But there isn't.

Instead, there is only the clear inference that these cameras are nothing but a poor form of revenue collection, a regressive form of taxation that hits hardest those least able to afford it.

Brian Levy, Baltimore

-
To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Cameras and corruption
    Cameras and corruption

    I have followed The Sun's investigation of Baltimore's speed and red light cameras from the beginning and believe a desire for a back door tax is what is driving Baltimore's concern and not protecting the poor innocent school children they claim when defending the constitutionality of such laws...

  • Safety or revenue?
    Safety or revenue?

    Before it was shut down over reports of widespread errors, Baltimore ran by far the largest speed camera program in the state and one of the largest in the nation. It generated a lot of tickets and a lot of revenue for the city — so much so that officials were fighting over what to do...

Comments
Loading