Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

Speed cameras: Safety or scam?

I was happy to see that The Sun finally do an investigation of the city's speed camera program — its "Stick 'em up!" program, as I like to call it ("Fast money," Nov. 18). Your reporters did a great job covering all aspects of the program's impact in the area, including its many shortcomings and how the local government defends it.

I never fully understood the justification for speed cameras in school zones in the first place. I can understand using them around highway construction sites during work hours, as the paper has been full of reports of highway workers getting hit by careless drivers who speed.

But school zones? I can't recall reading one article about a child getting run over by a speeding driver in a school zone. Children have been hit by cars at home, crossing roads around the area, and even by school buses, but I don't recall a single instance of a child being mowed down by speed demons in a school zone.

Has there been a study done to see how these cameras have impacted the school zones where they are located? Are fewer children being hit by cars where the cameras are placed?

I think the fact that the city has decided to switch the companies that operate the cameras in order to get a larger percentage of money from each ticket issued answers the question of whether it is for our safety or for the revenue.

Christopher Winslow, Baltimore

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Cameras and corruption
    Cameras and corruption

    I have followed The Sun's investigation of Baltimore's speed and red light cameras from the beginning and believe a desire for a back door tax is what is driving Baltimore's concern and not protecting the poor innocent school children they claim when defending the constitutionality of such laws...

  • Get a move on: Local speed limits are too low [Letter]
    Get a move on: Local speed limits are too low [Letter]

    Congratulations to Howard County for trying to figure out sensible speed limits ("Are Howard County's speed limits too low?" Aug. 5).

  • Smaller is better
    Smaller is better

    A Baltimore City Council investigative committee looking into the city's problem-plagued speed- and red light-camera program has discovered what should have been obvious all along: That the now suspended system was far too big to be managed efficiently, that it was set up too quickly by the...

  • The surreal comedy of Baltimore's speed cameras [Letter]
    The surreal comedy of Baltimore's speed cameras [Letter]

    I really wish I was in the speed camera consulting business in Baltimore right now, as I could make a killing ("City takes step toward new speed camera program Feb. 5). Why is this whole speed camera debacle turning into such a surreal comedy? One answer might be that there is such a total...

  • City speed camera saga gets stranger by the day [Letter]
    City speed camera saga gets stranger by the day [Letter]

    A national firm is not qualified to complete a simple engineering study of the city's speed cameras ("Mayor says audit firm was 'not sufficiently qualified,'" Jan. 29).

  • Failure all around
    Failure all around
  • Comedy Central at City Hall [Letter]
    Comedy Central at City Hall [Letter]

    Baltimore's mayor hides a report highly critical of the city's red-light and speed camera program, claiming that the vendor, whom she hired yet again, was somehow incompetent ("Mayor says audit firm was 'not sufficiently qualified,'" Jan. 29).

  • Why rehire the unqualified? [Letter]
    Why rehire the unqualified? [Letter]

    Regarding the URS Corp.'s red light and speed camera audit and their subsequent rehiring, "somebody's got some 'splaining to do" ("Mayor says audit firm was 'not sufficiently qualified,'" Jan. 29).

Comments
Loading