Summer Sale Extended! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

Dump cameras, install speed bumps [Letter]

Let me start off by saying that I am not opposed to speed cameras by themselves. I am only opposed to speed cameras that do not accurately measure speed and/or do not provide sufficient information in their documentation to violators to prove that the speed limit was exceeded by the amount specified by law.

Baltimore officials insist that the city's speed camera program is intended to protect the safety of schoolchildren and not to make money. Based on that stated objective, I would like to know why the city does not just install a series of speed bumps on the roads around the schools that pose the most risk to children. It seems to me this would be a lot less costly than spending significantly more taxpayer dollars trying to make a broken speed camera system work, including diagnosing the issues, repairing the inaccurate speed cameras and improving the software to provide the documented basis to prove the speed violation.

I believe Baltimore should avoid having to pay additional termination costs of $600,000 or more to another vendor if it also fails to successfully implement an accurate speed camera program ("Trouble persisted during Baltimore speed camera tests, record show," Dec. 21). It's bad enough that the city has to pay that kind of money to terminate its contract for non-performance with a vendor that never got the system successfully working as required by its contract. Not to mention the countless dollars returned to people who received speeding tickets that proved to be inaccurate and the countless taxpayer dollars spent by the police or other departments examining the violations for accuracy. That money could have been used toward installing speed bumps instead.

Accordingly, rather than spend any more taxpayer money on the cost of any future speed camera contracts, the cost of reviewing the violations for accuracy and the cost of any future contract terminations that will result if the new vendor does not successfully implement the program, use the amount of that saved money needed to install speed bumps. Then use any remaining money saved toward other city expenses.

Larry Scheinin, Baltimore

-
To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Speed cameras save lives? Prove it

    Speed cameras save lives? Prove it

    I read the article about money machines (speed cameras) in Baltimore County, and there certainly are a number of different numbers associated with these money grabbers ("Is Baltimore County doubling its speed camera budget?" May 30). I use these term because I believe most people think speed cameras...

  • Annapolis and speed cameras

    Annapolis and speed cameras

    Isn't it amazing how the courts have found that speed cameras are a safety feature and not an un-mandated nuisance tax, yet The Sun finds the news in the loss of revenue instead of the great job they are doing in slowing down traffic and clogging up the streets of Annapolis with bumper to bumper...

  • Cameras and corruption

    Cameras and corruption

    I have followed The Sun's investigation of Baltimore's speed and red light cameras from the beginning and believe a desire for a back door tax is what is driving Baltimore's concern and not protecting the poor innocent school children they claim when defending the constitutionality of such laws...

  • Smaller is better

    Smaller is better

    A Baltimore City Council investigative committee looking into the city's problem-plagued speed- and red light-camera program has discovered what should have been obvious all along: That the now suspended system was far too big to be managed efficiently, that it was set up too quickly by the companies...

  • Speed cameras don't save lives

    Speed cameras don't save lives

    A recent editorial claimed "speed cameras are a powerful tool for saving lives" ("Safety first," June 3) but the supporting evidence, "a reduction in speed-related crashes — 29 percent from 2009 to 2012" is about crashes, not lives.

  • Get a move on: Local speed limits are too low [Letter]

    Get a move on: Local speed limits are too low [Letter]

    Congratulations to Howard County for trying to figure out sensible speed limits ("Are Howard County's speed limits too low?" Aug. 5).

  • Safety or revenue?

    Safety or revenue?

    Before it was shut down over reports of widespread errors, Baltimore ran by far the largest speed camera program in the state and one of the largest in the nation. It generated a lot of tickets and a lot of revenue for the city — so much so that officials were fighting over what to do with the...

  • Speed cameras didn't make streets any safer

    Speed cameras didn't make streets any safer

    I enjoyed your recent article on the statistics regarding pedestrian accidents during and after the use of speed cameras ("Even with speed cameras off, no pedestrians injured in school zones," Dec. 19).

Comments
Loading
75°