Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

Dump cameras, install speed bumps [Letter]

Let me start off by saying that I am not opposed to speed cameras by themselves. I am only opposed to speed cameras that do not accurately measure speed and/or do not provide sufficient information in their documentation to violators to prove that the speed limit was exceeded by the amount specified by law.

Baltimore officials insist that the city's speed camera program is intended to protect the safety of schoolchildren and not to make money. Based on that stated objective, I would like to know why the city does not just install a series of speed bumps on the roads around the schools that pose the most risk to children. It seems to me this would be a lot less costly than spending significantly more taxpayer dollars trying to make a broken speed camera system work, including diagnosing the issues, repairing the inaccurate speed cameras and improving the software to provide the documented basis to prove the speed violation.

I believe Baltimore should avoid having to pay additional termination costs of $600,000 or more to another vendor if it also fails to successfully implement an accurate speed camera program ("Trouble persisted during Baltimore speed camera tests, record show," Dec. 21). It's bad enough that the city has to pay that kind of money to terminate its contract for non-performance with a vendor that never got the system successfully working as required by its contract. Not to mention the countless dollars returned to people who received speeding tickets that proved to be inaccurate and the countless taxpayer dollars spent by the police or other departments examining the violations for accuracy. That money could have been used toward installing speed bumps instead.

Accordingly, rather than spend any more taxpayer money on the cost of any future speed camera contracts, the cost of reviewing the violations for accuracy and the cost of any future contract terminations that will result if the new vendor does not successfully implement the program, use the amount of that saved money needed to install speed bumps. Then use any remaining money saved toward other city expenses.

Larry Scheinin, Baltimore

-
To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Cameras and corruption
    Cameras and corruption

    I have followed The Sun's investigation of Baltimore's speed and red light cameras from the beginning and believe a desire for a back door tax is what is driving Baltimore's concern and not protecting the poor innocent school children they claim when defending the constitutionality of such laws...

  • Get a move on: Local speed limits are too low [Letter]
    Get a move on: Local speed limits are too low [Letter]

    Congratulations to Howard County for trying to figure out sensible speed limits ("Are Howard County's speed limits too low?" Aug. 5).

  • Smaller is better
    Smaller is better

    A Baltimore City Council investigative committee looking into the city's problem-plagued speed- and red light-camera program has discovered what should have been obvious all along: That the now suspended system was far too big to be managed efficiently, that it was set up too quickly by the...

  • The surreal comedy of Baltimore's speed cameras [Letter]
    The surreal comedy of Baltimore's speed cameras [Letter]

    I really wish I was in the speed camera consulting business in Baltimore right now, as I could make a killing ("City takes step toward new speed camera program Feb. 5). Why is this whole speed camera debacle turning into such a surreal comedy? One answer might be that there is such a total...

  • City speed camera saga gets stranger by the day [Letter]
    City speed camera saga gets stranger by the day [Letter]

    A national firm is not qualified to complete a simple engineering study of the city's speed cameras ("Mayor says audit firm was 'not sufficiently qualified,'" Jan. 29).

  • Failure all around
    Failure all around
  • Comedy Central at City Hall [Letter]
    Comedy Central at City Hall [Letter]

    Baltimore's mayor hides a report highly critical of the city's red-light and speed camera program, claiming that the vendor, whom she hired yet again, was somehow incompetent ("Mayor says audit firm was 'not sufficiently qualified,'" Jan. 29).

  • Why rehire the unqualified? [Letter]
    Why rehire the unqualified? [Letter]

    Regarding the URS Corp.'s red light and speed camera audit and their subsequent rehiring, "somebody's got some 'splaining to do" ("Mayor says audit firm was 'not sufficiently qualified,'" Jan. 29).

Comments
Loading