Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

City speed cameras targeted revenue, not safety [Letter]

The problems with Baltimore's speed camera program ran much deeper than the issues The Sun describes with the two vendors who operated the cameras and administered the issuance of citations ("City plans to buy out camera contract," Dec. 17).

First, the law permitting speed cameras in "school zones" was well-intentioned and allowed the placement of cameras a considerable distance from schools as an aid to enforcing school zone speed limits and assuring the safety of children in the vicinity of schools. This did not mean, however, that the city should place its cameras at the maximum distance from the school allowed by law, unless there was a specific need to do so for the safety of school children. Unfortunately, Baltimore violated the spirit of the law by locating its cameras on main thoroughfares which were distant from, and had no apparent connection with, any school.

Under the program, large swaths of the city were designated as "school zones" with no apparent purpose other than to support the city's entitlement to fines from unsuspecting motorists. The city's intention that the speed camera program was to serve primarily as a revenue producer, rather than a safety measure, is further illustrated by the fact that citations were issued at times when schools were obviously closed, such as during vacation periods.

If Baltimore's school zone speed camera program is to be resurrected, it should be administered in a way that the public will have confidence that its primary purpose is for the safety of children, rather than just another measure to generate revenue for the city's coffers.

Berryl Speert, Baltimore

-
To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Cameras and corruption
    Cameras and corruption

    I have followed The Sun's investigation of Baltimore's speed and red light cameras from the beginning and believe a desire for a back door tax is what is driving Baltimore's concern and not protecting the poor innocent school children they claim when defending the constitutionality of such laws...

  • Get a move on: Local speed limits are too low [Letter]
    Get a move on: Local speed limits are too low [Letter]

    Congratulations to Howard County for trying to figure out sensible speed limits ("Are Howard County's speed limits too low?" Aug. 5).

  • Smaller is better
    Smaller is better

    A Baltimore City Council investigative committee looking into the city's problem-plagued speed- and red light-camera program has discovered what should have been obvious all along: That the now suspended system was far too big to be managed efficiently, that it was set up too quickly by the...

  • The surreal comedy of Baltimore's speed cameras [Letter]
    The surreal comedy of Baltimore's speed cameras [Letter]

    I really wish I was in the speed camera consulting business in Baltimore right now, as I could make a killing ("City takes step toward new speed camera program Feb. 5). Why is this whole speed camera debacle turning into such a surreal comedy? One answer might be that there is such a total...

  • City speed camera saga gets stranger by the day [Letter]
    City speed camera saga gets stranger by the day [Letter]

    A national firm is not qualified to complete a simple engineering study of the city's speed cameras ("Mayor says audit firm was 'not sufficiently qualified,'" Jan. 29).

  • Failure all around
    Failure all around
  • Comedy Central at City Hall [Letter]
    Comedy Central at City Hall [Letter]

    Baltimore's mayor hides a report highly critical of the city's red-light and speed camera program, claiming that the vendor, whom she hired yet again, was somehow incompetent ("Mayor says audit firm was 'not sufficiently qualified,'" Jan. 29).

  • Why rehire the unqualified? [Letter]
    Why rehire the unqualified? [Letter]

    Regarding the URS Corp.'s red light and speed camera audit and their subsequent rehiring, "somebody's got some 'splaining to do" ("Mayor says audit firm was 'not sufficiently qualified,'" Jan. 29).

Comments
Loading