Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99
News Opinion Readers Respond

On speed cameras, city ethics board failed

Your series of articles on the speed camera fiasco prompts me to make the following comments. Since I started teaching political science in 1964 with my first assignment at Ridgely Junior High School, I have developed a good idea of what constitutes good or bad behavior on the part of our politicians. Thus, on Jan. 6, I filed a formal complaint with the Baltimore City Board of Ethics concerning the behavior of Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake with regard to the speed camera mess. I stated in my complaint that Mayor Rawlings-Blake violated the sacred public trust by approving a speed camera program which allowed the Department of Transportation to issue tickets to citizens with the understanding that the company, Xerox State and Local Solutions, would receive a portion of every $40 ticket issued.

Even Gov. Martin O'Malley has said that paying a speed camera company based on the number of tickets — as Baltimore and Baltimore County do — is illegal. I also stated that the mayor knew that a number of the speed cameras were dysfunctional, yet she allowed the tickets to continue to be issued against citizens. It was only after your paper exposed these flaws that she finally called for an investigation. Thus, I suggested that the ethics board formally censure Mayor Rawlings-Blake for violating the public trust with regard to the speed camera debacle.

On Jan. 15, I was notified that the ethics board voted to dismiss my complaint. They offered the reason that their jurisdiction is limited to complaints that allege violations of items codified in the Baltimore City Ethics Law. What's more, the board's consideration of my complaint was not open to the public.

It seems to me this is positive proof of what a waste of taxpayers' money and what a joke the ethics board is. I ask that if the city ethics law doesn't allow the board to hear and adjudicate the grievances I brought forth, blatant violations of the public trust, then what useful purpose does the board serve? I say the time has come for the Baltimore City Board of Ethics to be abolished!

Ralph Jaffe

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
    Related Content
    • Get a move on: Local speed limits are too low [Letter]
      Get a move on: Local speed limits are too low [Letter]

      Congratulations to Howard County for trying to figure out sensible speed limits ("Are Howard County's speed limits too low?" Aug. 5).

    • Safety or revenue?
      Safety or revenue?

      Before it was shut down over reports of widespread errors, Baltimore ran by far the largest speed camera program in the state and one of the largest in the nation. It generated a lot of tickets and a lot of revenue for the city — so much so that officials were fighting over what to do...

    • Annapolis and speed cameras
      Annapolis and speed cameras

      Isn't it amazing how the courts have found that speed cameras are a safety feature and not an un-mandated nuisance tax, yet The Sun finds the news in the loss of revenue instead of the great job they are doing in slowing down traffic and clogging up the streets of Annapolis with bumper to...

    • Smaller is better
      Smaller is better

      A Baltimore City Council investigative committee looking into the city's problem-plagued speed- and red light-camera program has discovered what should have been obvious all along: That the now suspended system was far too big to be managed efficiently, that it was set up too quickly by the...

    • Cameras and corruption
      Cameras and corruption

      I have followed The Sun's investigation of Baltimore's speed and red light cameras from the beginning and believe a desire for a back door tax is what is driving Baltimore's concern and not protecting the poor innocent school children they claim when defending the constitutionality of such laws...

    • Speed cameras didn't make streets any safer
      Speed cameras didn't make streets any safer

      I enjoyed your recent article on the statistics regarding pedestrian accidents during and after the use of speed cameras ("Even with speed cameras off, no pedestrians injured in school zones," Dec. 19).

    • The surreal comedy of Baltimore's speed cameras [Letter]
      The surreal comedy of Baltimore's speed cameras [Letter]

      I really wish I was in the speed camera consulting business in Baltimore right now, as I could make a killing ("City takes step toward new speed camera program Feb. 5). Why is this whole speed camera debacle turning into such a surreal comedy? One answer might be that there is such a total...

    • City speed camera saga gets stranger by the day [Letter]
      City speed camera saga gets stranger by the day [Letter]

      A national firm is not qualified to complete a simple engineering study of the city's speed cameras ("Mayor says audit firm was 'not sufficiently qualified,'" Jan. 29).