Summer Savings! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Baltimore doesn't do enough to enforce the speed limit

A place where speed cameras would yield additional revenue and improve quality of life is the section of the Jones Falls Expressway between Cold Spring Lane and Northern Parkway adjacent to the residential area where I and several thousand other residents live ("Speed cameras yield $19.2 million," Sept. 12).

Motorcyclists use this stretch of highway as a race track, violating the speed limit, the maximum decibel level for noise and the helmet laws. This starts during the early evening and stretches into the wee hours of the morning.

At night in the spring and summer, motorcyclists roar up the JFX at speeds exceeding 80 mph with exhausts approaching the decibel levels of aircraft jet engines. Yet there seems to be no attempt to put a stop to any of these violations.

With today's technology, night vision cameras, decibel level reading equipment are available. If installed at along the JFX they could stop this total disregard for the law and its effect on surrounding areas. It might even save a few lives.

When I brought this subject up to our local City Council member, I was advised to contact the Northwest district police headquarters. I got the feeling that the council person themselves couldn't be bothered.

On several occasions I have noticed city or state police on the highway while a motorcyclist roared by 20 to 30 mph over the speed limit. But the authorities never gave chase.

Aren't we faced with enough people already who feel that the laws don't apply to them? Suppose we all took this attitude? What a crazy world that would be.

Baltimore needs to step up to the plate and begin enforcing the speed limit for all vehicles, be they automobiles or motorcycles.

Sidney M. Levy, Baltimore

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Speed cameras save lives? Prove it

    Speed cameras save lives? Prove it

    I read the article about money machines (speed cameras) in Baltimore County, and there certainly are a number of different numbers associated with these money grabbers ("Is Baltimore County doubling its speed camera budget?" May 30). I use these term because I believe most people think speed cameras...

  • Annapolis and speed cameras

    Annapolis and speed cameras

    Isn't it amazing how the courts have found that speed cameras are a safety feature and not an un-mandated nuisance tax, yet The Sun finds the news in the loss of revenue instead of the great job they are doing in slowing down traffic and clogging up the streets of Annapolis with bumper to bumper...

  • Speed cameras didn't make streets any safer

    Speed cameras didn't make streets any safer

    I enjoyed your recent article on the statistics regarding pedestrian accidents during and after the use of speed cameras ("Even with speed cameras off, no pedestrians injured in school zones," Dec. 19).

  • Safety or revenue?

    Safety or revenue?

    Before it was shut down over reports of widespread errors, Baltimore ran by far the largest speed camera program in the state and one of the largest in the nation. It generated a lot of tickets and a lot of revenue for the city — so much so that officials were fighting over what to do with the...

  • Smaller is better

    Smaller is better

    A Baltimore City Council investigative committee looking into the city's problem-plagued speed- and red light-camera program has discovered what should have been obvious all along: That the now suspended system was far too big to be managed efficiently, that it was set up too quickly by the companies...

  • Speed cameras don't save lives

    Speed cameras don't save lives

    A recent editorial claimed "speed cameras are a powerful tool for saving lives" ("Safety first," June 3) but the supporting evidence, "a reduction in speed-related crashes — 29 percent from 2009 to 2012" is about crashes, not lives.