Get unlimited digital access to $0.99 for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

Why is the city paying for speed cameras it will never use? [Letter]

The Sun has published several lengthy articles about Baltimore City's troubled speed and red light camera system ("Trouble persisted during Baltimore speed camera tests, records show Dec. 21).

Based on the information provided, it appears that Baltimore is cutting ties with the contractor because of the contractor's failure to provide a usable and reliable system. But if so, why is Baltimore paying the contractor even more money?

Shouldn't the contractor be providing a refund to Baltimore City? I guess we will never know, because both parties agreed to a "a non-disparagement clause" in the contract termination agreement. So where is the accountability to the taxpayer?

Scott Richardson, Westminster

To respond to this letter, send an email to Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Cameras and corruption
    Cameras and corruption

    I have followed The Sun's investigation of Baltimore's speed and red light cameras from the beginning and believe a desire for a back door tax is what is driving Baltimore's concern and not protecting the poor innocent school children they claim when defending the constitutionality of such laws...

  • Safety or revenue?
    Safety or revenue?

    Before it was shut down over reports of widespread errors, Baltimore ran by far the largest speed camera program in the state and one of the largest in the nation. It generated a lot of tickets and a lot of revenue for the city — so much so that officials were fighting over what to do...