Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Speed cameras are about raising revenue, not safety

I understand why speed cameras are needed at all times in construction zones; even if there are no workers present, the highway lanes are often narrow and twisting and require a lower speed ("Delays, detours and dead ends on cameras," Nov. 25).

Regarding school zone cameras, however, are we supposed to believe that a child hit by a vehicle traveling 12 mph over the speed limit sustains more serious injuries than a child struck by car going only 11 mph over the limit?

Since the answer is obviously not, why then are vehicles ticketed only if they exceed the posted limit by 12 mph or more? The speed limit is the law, and anyone exceeding it is in violation.

This shows that speed cameras are and always have been simply a revenue source that our government needs to continue its excessive spending.

Clay Seeley, Owings Mills

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Speed cameras didn't make streets any safer

    Speed cameras didn't make streets any safer

    I enjoyed your recent article on the statistics regarding pedestrian accidents during and after the use of speed cameras ("Even with speed cameras off, no pedestrians injured in school zones," Dec. 19).

  • Safety or revenue?

    Safety or revenue?

    Before it was shut down over reports of widespread errors, Baltimore ran by far the largest speed camera program in the state and one of the largest in the nation. It generated a lot of tickets and a lot of revenue for the city — so much so that officials were fighting over what to do with the...

  • Smaller is better

    Smaller is better

    A Baltimore City Council investigative committee looking into the city's problem-plagued speed- and red light-camera program has discovered what should have been obvious all along: That the now suspended system was far too big to be managed efficiently, that it was set up too quickly by the companies...

  • Cameras and corruption

    Cameras and corruption

    I have followed The Sun's investigation of Baltimore's speed and red light cameras from the beginning and believe a desire for a back door tax is what is driving Baltimore's concern and not protecting the poor innocent school children they claim when defending the constitutionality of such laws...

  • Get a move on: Local speed limits are too low [Letter]

    Get a move on: Local speed limits are too low [Letter]

    Congratulations to Howard County for trying to figure out sensible speed limits ("Are Howard County's speed limits too low?" Aug. 5).

  • Annapolis and speed cameras

    Annapolis and speed cameras

    Isn't it amazing how the courts have found that speed cameras are a safety feature and not an un-mandated nuisance tax, yet The Sun finds the news in the loss of revenue instead of the great job they are doing in slowing down traffic and clogging up the streets of Annapolis with bumper to bumper...

  • The surreal comedy of Baltimore's speed cameras [Letter]

    The surreal comedy of Baltimore's speed cameras [Letter]

    I really wish I was in the speed camera consulting business in Baltimore right now, as I could make a killing ("City takes step toward new speed camera program Feb. 5). Why is this whole speed camera debacle turning into such a surreal comedy? One answer might be that there is such a total disconnect...

  • City speed camera saga gets stranger by the day [Letter]

    City speed camera saga gets stranger by the day [Letter]

    A national firm is not qualified to complete a simple engineering study of the city's speed cameras ("Mayor says audit firm was 'not sufficiently qualified,'" Jan. 29).

Comments
Loading

70°