Summer Sale! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

Finally, some common sense about speed cameras

I was delighted to read your recent editorial in support of Maryland's speed cameras ("The purpose of speed cameras," Dec. 27), especially as it followed a column by Jay Hancock in which he departed from the genius that normally distinguishes his commentary and entered the realm of the blathering "booboisie" of AM talk radio ("'Speed trap state' new Md. motto, thanks to cameras," Dec. 12).

Mr. Hancock gave us the Connecticut businessman so outraged over a $40 speeding ticket for driving 67 mph in a 55 mph work zone that he threatened to stop doing business in Maryland. About which Mr. Hancock's more intelligent side might have observed: If the Connecticut Yankee businessman's trade in Maryland could be influenced by such a small matter, he either is not doing much business in Maryland, or he really didn't mean what he said.

Given that the man from Connecticut asserted that he never drives more than five miles over the speed limit, the latter would seem more likely.

Whatever could cause Mr. Hancock to join the ranks of such fatuous radio blatherers as Tom Marr and Patrick McDonough? This was revealed in the column's parenthetical disclosure that a camera recently caught Mr. Hancock himself driving 43 mph in a 30 mph school zone.

He does not cite statistics on the greater severity of injuries likely to be suffered by a child when hit by a vehicle traveling 43 mph compared to 30 mph. But I expect he would agree there is no excuse for speeding in a school zone.

Mr. Hancock is not the only individual of influence to stray from good sense on this issue. Your editorial reports that state Sen. Jim Brochin, a Towson Democrat, wants work-zone speed cameras deactivated at times when no one is working in the zones.

He has in mind the lately unpopulated work zone at Charles Street and the beltway, which, as your editorial points out, remains a dangerously challenging road design with or without workers on site. How on earth does Senator Brochin reconcile this position with his very laudable campaign against the use of cell phones and texting devices while driving?

Thank you for your very sensible editorial on this subject. Its impact was only slightly diminished by the absurd notion that we might "sympathize with those who have tickets to pay."

To which I say, "Bah Humbug!" Make the fines higher. Add points. Anything to keep that Connecticut Yankee out of the great Free State.

G. J. Price III, Glyndon

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Speed cameras save lives? Prove it

    Speed cameras save lives? Prove it

    I read the article about money machines (speed cameras) in Baltimore County, and there certainly are a number of different numbers associated with these money grabbers ("Is Baltimore County doubling its speed camera budget?" May 30). I use these term because I believe most people think speed cameras...

  • Annapolis and speed cameras

    Annapolis and speed cameras

    Isn't it amazing how the courts have found that speed cameras are a safety feature and not an un-mandated nuisance tax, yet The Sun finds the news in the loss of revenue instead of the great job they are doing in slowing down traffic and clogging up the streets of Annapolis with bumper to bumper...

  • Cameras and corruption

    Cameras and corruption

    I have followed The Sun's investigation of Baltimore's speed and red light cameras from the beginning and believe a desire for a back door tax is what is driving Baltimore's concern and not protecting the poor innocent school children they claim when defending the constitutionality of such laws...

  • Smaller is better

    Smaller is better

    A Baltimore City Council investigative committee looking into the city's problem-plagued speed- and red light-camera program has discovered what should have been obvious all along: That the now suspended system was far too big to be managed efficiently, that it was set up too quickly by the companies...

  • Speed cameras don't save lives

    Speed cameras don't save lives

    A recent editorial claimed "speed cameras are a powerful tool for saving lives" ("Safety first," June 3) but the supporting evidence, "a reduction in speed-related crashes — 29 percent from 2009 to 2012" is about crashes, not lives.

  • Get a move on: Local speed limits are too low [Letter]

    Get a move on: Local speed limits are too low [Letter]

    Congratulations to Howard County for trying to figure out sensible speed limits ("Are Howard County's speed limits too low?" Aug. 5).

  • Safety or revenue?

    Safety or revenue?

    Before it was shut down over reports of widespread errors, Baltimore ran by far the largest speed camera program in the state and one of the largest in the nation. It generated a lot of tickets and a lot of revenue for the city — so much so that officials were fighting over what to do with the...

  • Speed cameras didn't make streets any safer

    Speed cameras didn't make streets any safer

    I enjoyed your recent article on the statistics regarding pedestrian accidents during and after the use of speed cameras ("Even with speed cameras off, no pedestrians injured in school zones," Dec. 19).