Summer Savings! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

What do speeders tell their children about why they break the law?

It is most amusing to see the controversy surrounding speed cameras and the revenue they generate ("Speeding drivers get the blame," Sept. 13). I wonder what we tell our children sitting in the back seat. When they say, "Daddy, why are you speeding?" do we explain that "Daddy doesn't have to obey the laws," or do we say "Because almost everybody else is doing it too?"

We claim to be a democratic country, and as such we elect officials to administer highway construction and safety enforcement on the public streets. We all own the highways together. The officials that "we, the people" elect and appoint to manage traffic safety are usually highly educated, experienced engineers and traffic experts with significant experience.

"We, the people" count on them to study the weights and speeds of vehicles, accident and speed-related statistics, designs of the road, signage and state-of-the-art construction techniques and materials to make the family pleasure trip as safe as the delivery truck, or a school bus on a rainy day. Intelligent, sincere, hard-working experts (who we have "hired" through our elected government process) they are usually the ones who know the speed limits and road conditions relationship better than the average good driver.

The point is, if the revenue brought in by catching speeders on camera — whether they are sweet old ladies on their way to church or college students on their way to the homecoming game — that revenue represents a legitimate income taken out of the pocket of the lawbreaker, whether it is you or me, dear reader. Tickets can be contested in court, if you think you are innocent or should be excepted from complying with the laws.

As a matter of fact, if we really were seeking more income for the state, the Baltimore Beltway is a classic example of where technology would pay for almost any bills we have as a state. By that, I mean that the posted speed limit often is ignored, and "Indy 500" mentality prevails with impunity for the tailgaters eager to go 65, 75, and more.

If you want no cameras, tell your elected representatives. If you want more traffic patrols in certain areas, tell your elected representatives. If you want faster speed limits to be posted, tell your elected representatives.

The bigger question, however, is: What are you going to tell your children about your own speeding and why the laws do not apply to you? What are you going to tell the parents of the child who was hit by a speeding car because the driver didn't like the "big brother" cameras? Will you say "Oh, traffic cameras are just cash cows? " If camera-enforced safety is what it takes for drivers, supposedly adults, to obey their own laws, then bring in herds of those cash cows.

Edgar C. Ludwig, Baltimore

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Speed cameras save lives? Prove it

    Speed cameras save lives? Prove it

    I read the article about money machines (speed cameras) in Baltimore County, and there certainly are a number of different numbers associated with these money grabbers ("Is Baltimore County doubling its speed camera budget?" May 30). I use these term because I believe most people think speed cameras...

  • Annapolis and speed cameras

    Annapolis and speed cameras

    Isn't it amazing how the courts have found that speed cameras are a safety feature and not an un-mandated nuisance tax, yet The Sun finds the news in the loss of revenue instead of the great job they are doing in slowing down traffic and clogging up the streets of Annapolis with bumper to bumper...

  • Cameras and corruption

    Cameras and corruption

    I have followed The Sun's investigation of Baltimore's speed and red light cameras from the beginning and believe a desire for a back door tax is what is driving Baltimore's concern and not protecting the poor innocent school children they claim when defending the constitutionality of such laws...

  • Smaller is better

    Smaller is better

    A Baltimore City Council investigative committee looking into the city's problem-plagued speed- and red light-camera program has discovered what should have been obvious all along: That the now suspended system was far too big to be managed efficiently, that it was set up too quickly by the companies...

  • Speed cameras don't save lives

    Speed cameras don't save lives

    A recent editorial claimed "speed cameras are a powerful tool for saving lives" ("Safety first," June 3) but the supporting evidence, "a reduction in speed-related crashes — 29 percent from 2009 to 2012" is about crashes, not lives.

  • Get a move on: Local speed limits are too low [Letter]

    Get a move on: Local speed limits are too low [Letter]

    Congratulations to Howard County for trying to figure out sensible speed limits ("Are Howard County's speed limits too low?" Aug. 5).

Comments
Loading
79°