Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Customers support Southwest Airlines' changes

As a proud employee of Southwest Airlines, I read your article ("Is Southwest Airlines losing the luv?" Feb. 9) with dismay. Within the article you acknowledge the fact that Southwest is still the only airline allowing two bags to fly free while simultaneously berating the company for "swelling its bottom line." While most of the reporting in this piece is technically accurate, the omission of information is unfortunate at best and could easily lead readers to believe that the opinions reflected by the few customers quoted here represent a majority.

Firstly, while criticizing the new rapid rewards program you neglect to mention that customer feedback indicates that the majority of Southwest's customers are happy with the new program and its lack of blackout dates. The best evidence of customer satisfaction in this regard is the fact that the program has increased its membership significantly since being revamped.

Next you mention that Southwest "...cut the legroom on many planes to fit more seats," neglecting the fact that the new interior increased under-seat storage space, utilizes stronger materials that allow for more comfortable personal space and provides better lumbar support, and saves about six pounds per seat, allowing the airline to burn less fuel per flight and reduce carbon emissions, all the while sacrificing only a tiny amount of leg room. Again, the proof here is in customer feedback, which indicates overall support for the redesigned interior. Many, including myself, industry experts, and customers recognize that the interior redesign was a creative way to increase revenue in a very challenging economic environment without sacrificing the customer experience — all while allowing ticket prices to remain stable, an obvious benefit for fliers.

Lastly, you indicate that some customers are unhappy with the new optional fee for early boarding, failing to highlight the clear and significant difference between a mandatory fee and an option, which gives customers the choice of participating in the program. Oh, and once again you fail to note that the majority of customer responses to this program have been positive. While there will always be a few dissatisfied customers among those who fly any airline, I believe most of Southwest's customers recognize that the changes the airline is making are necessary in a challenging economic environment and, overall, are beneficial to fliers.

Mike Jacobson, Baltimore

The writer is a Southwest Airlines pilot.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Southwest adds $40 fee to board early

    Southwest adds $40 fee to board early

    Passengers can pay at the gate to join 'A' group

  • BWI sets passenger record for 2012; overseas travel increases

    BWI sets passenger record for 2012; overseas travel increases

    Airline expansion fuels growth, terminal project sets table for future

  • No dancing on Red Line's grave

    No dancing on Red Line's grave

    Spare us the dancing on the grave of the Red Line by those who have no right to call it a boondoggle ("Red Line was a boondoggle," June 30). We'll never know if it was or not since it won't be built in my lifetime. Certainly, I can't foresee any of Baltimore's myriad social problems improving without...

  • Ban smokeless tobacco from baseball

    Ban smokeless tobacco from baseball

    It is time for Major League Baseball to take a stand and ban smokeless tobacco, period. It is a foul, disgusting and dangerous addiction. It's never talked about until you hear of a player or former player who is diagnosed with mouth cancer or a player such as Tony Gwynn dies from the disease (...

  • EPA mercury ruling was even-handed

    EPA mercury ruling was even-handed

    The Sun's article on mercury limits incorrectly asserts that the U.S. Supreme Court split on ideological grounds ("Justices rule against EPA power plant mercury limits," June 29). On the contrary, the Supreme Court split was one between original intent, honest interpretations of the Constitution...

  • Reimer was The Sun's best

    Reimer was The Sun's best

    Congratulations to Susan Reimer on her retirement. I will definitely miss her column. It was the only thing worth reading in what they call The Sun ("Susan Reimer signs off," June 25).