Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
NewsOpinionReaders Respond

Storm water fees are unnecessary and excessive

Isn't the storm water tax just another "protect the bay" fee ("The 'rain tax' sham," April 17)? Otherwise, what is the "flush tax" for and where does all this money go?

Your editorial suggests that "for most, the fee is modest. In Baltimore County, for instance, the owner of a single-family home will pay $39 annually."

I am being "modest fee'd" to death. Where are we now, 37 additional taxes, fees or rate increases in the last few years?

I guess we need to establish another bloated government agency with twice as many employees as needed, being paid too much to do as little as possible. Maryland's unemployment rate will then go down, and our legislators for life will look good.

It is no wonder people are retiring and moving out of this state.

Craig Garfield

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
    Related Content
    • Churches should not have to pay stormwater fees [Letter]
      Churches should not have to pay stormwater fees [Letter]

      In response to your paper's recent article about churches paying stormwater fees, I would point out that churches provide heavily discounted space for community groups and that many house affordable kindergarten and nursery school programs and provide food and shelter for at-risk populations...

    • The bogus 'rain tax' repeal
      The bogus 'rain tax' repeal

      Despite facing a bigger-than-expected budget shortfall, and although he promised a policy blackout until he takes office, Governor-elect Larry Hogan last week publicly reiterated his support for repealing Maryland's "rain tax" while meeting with fellow Republican governors in Florida. He told...

    • 'Rain tax' sobriquet is misleading
      'Rain tax' sobriquet is misleading

      I find the continued use of the term "rain tax" to be misleading at best ("After Hogan victory, local governments look to cut taxes and fees," Nov. 15).

    • Churches get cozy with government [Letter]
      Churches get cozy with government [Letter]

      Concerning the article, "Faith groups wrestling with stormwater fee" (Feb. 18), religious organizations should recognize that the camel's head is under the tent.

    • Md. must enforce stormwater controls [Letter]
      Md. must enforce stormwater controls [Letter]

      In a letter to the editor ("Md. leads the region in reducing stormwater runoff," Jan. 10), Maryland Department of the Environment Secretary Robert Summers took issue with concerns I expressed earlier in The Sun ("Bay advocates say state lax in monitoring county stormwater controls," Jan. 3). At...

    • Why bother having a legislative session? [Letter]
      Why bother having a legislative session? [Letter]

      I'm so grateful that the voters in Maryland don't have to worry about contacting our legislators in Annapolis to present our views on the rain tax. Thank you, Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller and House Speaker Michael E. Busch for making the decision for us that there will be no repeal...

    Comments
    Loading