Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Ehrlich is wrong about Obama and the Social Security disability program

As someone who has made a career advocating on behalf of those that depend on Social Security Disability and Supplemental Security Income benefits, I was disheartened to read Robert L. Ehrlich Jr.'s column, "Disability insurance entitlement explodes under Obama" (March 3).

The percentage increase in people on Social Security disability in recent years was expected, due to the aging Baby Boomers, half of whom are now reaching "high disability years." Additionally, there has been an increase of women in the workforce in recent decades, women who are now eligible to draw on their own earnings record when they become disabled. Combined with the worst economic downturn in years, which makes it more difficult for workers with disabilities to keep their jobs, the numbers aren't surprising.

It's imperative we remember that Social Security does not contribute to the deficit; it is self-financed by payroll taxes. By law, the system cannot spend money it does not have and cannot borrow. People with disabilities who need these benefits when they cannot work should be able to receive the benefits they paid for in payroll taxes when they were able to work.

Furthermore, only individuals with the most significant disabilities are eligible for SSDI benefits. Only around 40 percent of those who apply for benefits are eventually approved, ensuring that only those who meet the strict requirements are found eligible.

Lastly, benefits are modest. Individuals receive on average around $13,500 per year, just enough to help beneficiaries avoid homelessness and bankruptcy.

Millions of American workers depend on the Social Security Disability Insurance program for life-sustaining funds. It deserves to be protected, not attacked. Congress must maintain a strong and responsive disability insurance program, while making changes to ensure its longevity for the most vulnerable American workers and their families.

Ethel Zelenske, Baltimore

The writer is the director of government affairs for the National Organization of Social Security Claimants' Representatives (NOSSCR) in Washington.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • American values under Obama

    American values under Obama

    Two columns ago, I passed on a series of political observations from the heartland. Today, a snapshot of American values and viewpoints a decade and a half into the "new" millennium.

  • Ehrlich too negative, too partisan

    Ehrlich too negative, too partisan

    Robert L. Ehrlich Jr.'s cocky and aggressive partisanship make it evident why he couldn't govern effectively in Annapolis and was not re-elected for a second term ("Why Obama is viewed as weak," Nov. 30).

  • Ehrlich rants an embarrassment

    Ehrlich rants an embarrassment

    Not quite 10 years ago when I moved to Baltimore from a D.C. suburb, I made the decision to switch from The Washington Post to The Baltimore Sun for my daily news read. Ever since, I have had the paper delivered to my home on a daily basis. Even as it has gone down hill in content over that time....

  • Middle class value claims are a 'joke' [Commentary]

    Middle class value claims are a 'joke' [Commentary]

    It's the political season, which explains another column of "Things That Bug Me." Herewith my latest list for your consideration:

  • Respect the power of the pardon [Commentary]

    Respect the power of the pardon [Commentary]

    "[O]ne man appears to be a more eligible dispenser of the mercy of government, than a body of men."

  • Why Obama is viewed as weak

    Why Obama is viewed as weak

    Two recent Presidential pronouncements reflect the essential Barack Obama. Each also explains why so many view him to be the weakest of American presidents.

  • Unforced errors or tactical mistakes?

    Unforced errors or tactical mistakes?

    Political pundits like to label gratuitous political gaffes as "unforced errors" — mistakes that come out of right field without warning or reason.

  • Ehrlich's 'cult of anti-Obamaism'

    Ehrlich's 'cult of anti-Obamaism'

    Though I am 1960s retread boomer and unrepentant liberal who usually disagrees commentator Robert L. Ehrlich Jr., I read his column regularly. No surprise that he recently panned Obamacare — again — but what I never hear from Republicans is the Plan B, i.e., how we deal with the 40 million Americans...

Comments
Loading

84°