In Case You Missed It: NBA in Baltimore
NewsOpinionReaders Respond

Loss of SNAP benefits costly to Maryland

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance ProgramHealth InsuranceProductivityU.S. Department of Agriculture

On Nov. 1, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits (also known as food stamps) will be reduced, creating ramifications beyond the already incomprehensible fact that more than one in eight central Maryland residents (and one in five children) is food insecure.

The impact of these cuts will ripple throughout our communities and our economy well into the future. The Sun wisely pointed out in its Oct. 30 editorial ("Hunger gets a boost" that retailers, distributors, truck drivers and particularly farmers will be hurting as a result of the SNAP reductions. In fact, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, every $5 of SNAP benefits creates $9 of economic growth. In 2012, SNAP benefits propelled nearly $1.1 billion into Maryland's economy.

The long-term impact is also real but less immediately perceptible. Hunger is linked with children's success in school. Studies show that children who eat breakfast miss less school and perform better in math, averaging about 17 percent higher on math test scores. (Source: Share Our Strength.) The U.S. is already ranked well below other developed countries in East Asia and Europe in terms of math and science test scores. These cuts will only further exacerbate our country's growing achievement gaps — both globally and between socioeconomic groups domestically.

Not only can hunger impact academic success for children, it also increases one's likelihood of becoming obese and developing chronic disease which add up to increased health care costs in our country. According to the Center for American Progress, America's "hunger bill" (the cost of hunger, encompassing avoidable medical bills, loss of economic productivity and other costs stemming from food insecurity) is $167 billion a year.

SNAP benefits are one of the few entitlement programs that are proven to help lift people out of poverty. Reducing them is a detriment not only to the members of our community who need help most, but our society as a whole.

Mark Furst, Baltimore

The writer is president and CEO of the United Way of Central Maryland.

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance ProgramHealth InsuranceProductivityU.S. Department of Agriculture
  • Food stamps are not enough
    Food stamps are not enough

    I decided to participate in the Food Stamp Challenge last week to confront Congress' recent benefit reduction, as highlighted in The Sun's recent editorial ("Hunger gets a boost," Oct. 29). As a social worker in D.C., I am acutely aware that food stamps may supplement income...

  • What poor kids get from farmers' markets
    What poor kids get from farmers' markets

    Our view: Mayor's food stamp subsidy acknowledges the stake Baltimore has in ensuring the nutritional needs of children from low-income families are met

  • Hunger gets a boost
    Hunger gets a boost

    Our view: With SNAP benefits set to be reduced by week's end, this isn't the time to force millions of Americans out of food stamp program

  • Food stamps help families with kids

    As an organization working to end childhood hunger in Maryland, Share Our Strength appreciates your editorial about the merits of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program ("Food stamp recipients are the new welfare queens," Dec. 4).

  • Food stamps are not needed
    Food stamps are not needed

    It is unfortunate that The Sun would publish irrelevant commentary such as Michael J. Wilson's "Living hungry" (Oct. 28). There are dozens of programs, many overlapping, administered by federal, state, county, and municipal agencies devoted to assisting low-income individuals and...

  • Ulman-Rutherford (or vice versa) the best ticket
    Ulman-Rutherford (or vice versa) the best ticket

    Count me among the people who are dispirited by the governor's race. Thus, The Sun's suggestion that a ticket featuring the candidates for lieutenant governor, Democrat Ken Ulman and Republican Boyd Rutherford (or vice-versa), would present a far better ticket than pairing Mr. Ulman...

Comments
Loading