Summer Savings! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

Smith Island claims sound too good to be true

I don't begrudge Smith Islanders trying to preserve their way of life in their appeal to your readership for the public to fund, in the words of Smith Island United, "the cost of these huge projects" ("Demise of Smith Island is far from inevitable," July 7). And why not if the state only has to pony up 25 percent on the project as was claimed? But I question whether that 75/25 federal and state contribution still holds true. I also question whether it will do any good, given some of the maps I've seen on sea levels rises in the Chesapeake Bay region.

When I was last on Tylerton, I was told that island has 58 full-time residents. I don't imagine Rhodes Point or Ewell have many more. These proposed "huge projects" might benefit perhaps 200 people by allowing them to retain their idyllic existence. In contrast, the building of the Red Line in Baltimore should benefit close to a million people and unfortunately suffers from a 50/50 federal and state startup ratio, a lot lower state contribution than the cost of restoring Poplar Island in 1998. And in comparison to Smith Islanders fighting the sea, every indication is that more public transit would work well, create jobs and help everyone in the Baltimore area (including the single vehicle commuters who will see their traffic snarls abated).

I'd like to know what the current federal and state contribution ratio would be and what is the total cost. It would be completely insane if the price of restoring Smith Island requires a lower state contribution than the Red Line.

Paul R. Schlitz Jr., Baltimore

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Smith Island has much to offer

    Smith Island has much to offer

    The opinions expressed by letter writer Craig Piette ("Time to cut bait on Smith Island," July 11) reflect a lack of knowledge of the subject matter. It also wasn't clear whether he visited Ewell or Rhodes Point during his time on Smith Island or only Tylerton. Smith Island is made up of all three...

  • Time to cut bait on Smith Island

    Time to cut bait on Smith Island

    A recent commentator speculated about whether Smith Island can be rescued from oblivion ("Smith Island can be saved," July 7). I ask, why bother? For the 50 years I've lived in Maryland, I've heard Smith Island this, Smith Island that. I really believed there was something to Smith Island. Boy,...

  • Smith Island denial

    Smith Island denial

    Our view: Somerset County's choice to refuse voluntary buyouts reflects fierce pride in a community but a poor grasp of climate change realities

  • Demise of Smith Island is far from inevitable

    Demise of Smith Island is far from inevitable

    If the government is willing to invest, a bay island and its residents can be saved

  • Smith Islanders should direct ire at Washington

    Smith Islanders should direct ire at Washington

    Tim Wheeler's report on the future of Smith Island and the state's idea to buy residents out so they may relocate tells a heartbreaking story of people whose attachment to the island goes back many years, 400 years in some cases ("Smith Islanders debating a state buyout proposal," May 13). If the...

  • Let Smith Islanders stay

    Let Smith Islanders stay

    Having been raised in Baltimore, and lived in larger cities, it was with trepidation that I moved to the Eastern Shore many years ago. I have learned to appreciate the values, the culture and the hard work of the farmers and watermen who live here.

  • Fee for ambulance ride is a mistake

    Fee for ambulance ride is a mistake

    I am writing in response to your editorial of July 22, "Ambulance fee, finally." In your editorial you comment about the decision by Baltimore County to begin charging a fee for emergency medical services and how it is long overdue.

  • EXIM limbo will hurt small businesses

    EXIM limbo will hurt small businesses

    I agree wholeheartedly with your July 27 editorial, "Revive Export-Import Bank," which rightly points out just how misguided it would be to sacrifice exports and jobs, as you wrote, "for the sake of laissez-faire purity." It is outrageous that House Republican leaders broke for recess without bringing...

Comments
Loading
73°