Summer Savings! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

Declining a smart meter too costly [Letter]

I read with great interest Jamie Smith Hopkins' article about snags with smart meters ("Indoor meters present challenges in smart-meter rollout," April 28).

Viva House, a Catholic Worker hospitality house that has been serving the Baltimore community for 46 years, just received four notices from BGE regarding our meters. The two buildings that comprise our soup kitchen and food pantry are configured in such a way that we have four meters and thus receive four bills each month.

The Viva House community chose to "opt out" on the installation of even one smart meter. We do not need or want any more technology invading our space and do not believe such meters will prove safe over the long haul. We do not believe all health and privacy concerns have been adequately researched and addressed. Additionally, we believe that the installation of the meters will mean fewer BGE workers and even more unemployment. We need this like we need one more murder, one more addict or one more child dropping out of school in Baltimore City.

For opting out, we get bashed in the face. For not "going along" with smart meters, we are being fined big time. The Public Service Commission has given BGE the green light to charge those who opt out $75 initially and then $11 per month forever. For Viva House, this means $300 initially and $44 per month ($528 per year) forever.

When I go to the airport, I opt out of the detectors and go through the body search. I am not robbed for my decision. How can the Public Service Commission permit this extortion? How is it possible to charge $300 and then another $528 per year? For what?

Not long ago when meter readers went to each home and could not enter, customers were asked to fill out a card indicating usage. Eventually, the meter reader would get into the residence, read the meter and make any correction. BGE always got its money.

We have always paid for whatever energy we used. Over a decade, this amounts to at least $40,000. That is not pocket change. We have no choice but to pay the BGE monopoly. And we have no choice but to use BGE meters. We will pay for usage but not for extortion, and the Public Service Commission should insist on our right and the rights of all customers to opt out.

Brendan Walsh, Baltimore

To respond to this letter, send an email to Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Baltimore needs BRT

    Baltimore needs BRT

    Recently, Lt. Gov. Boyd Rutherford announced that Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) should be considered as an alternative instead of the now-shelved Red Line light rail system ("Who knew Hogan, Rutherford were such transit geeks," July 15). Why? Costs. Light rail is extremely expensive — to the tune of...

  • Orioles: No gnomes, please

    Orioles: No gnomes, please

    In light of the Orioles recent near-death spiral, many fans have pinned the blame on the Buck Showalter Garden Gnome giveaway ("Buck Showalter garden gnome briefly causes long lines at Camden Yards," June 28). True, their record since the promotion has been dismal and Buck Showalter was warned...

  • Baltimore remains a fiber desert

    Baltimore remains a fiber desert

    Like Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake's Smarter Baltimore draft report, the commentary, "Broadband for Baltimore" (July 27), has solid recommendations for building high speed Internet in Baltimore. But like that report, it ignores the principal reason that Baltimore City doesn't have broadband. Verizon's...

  • The evil of Iran

    The evil of Iran

    We sat 5,000-plus strong in the Walter E. Washington Convention Center in the District of Columbia for three intense days of Christians United For Israel (CUFI) 10th summit on July 12-14. We came from all across the nation (including 95 members from other countries and 500 college students). We...

  • Iran deal — war now or war later

    Iran deal — war now or war later

    In its recent editorial, The Sun adopts President Barack Obama's primary argument in favor of the Iran deal — that the only choice is the deal or war ("A 'good enough' agreement," July 24). No one wants war. But the choice here is not war or no war. It is war now or war later.

  • Trump is the anti-politician

    Trump is the anti-politician

    Why are the press and both political parties so upset that Donald Trump is running for president ("The Trump lesson that Bush and Clinton should heed," July 27)? Could it be that he does not need someone else's money so the Democratic National Committee, GOP, George Soros or big business can't...