Get unlimited digital access to baltimoresun.com. $0.99 for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

Radiation risk of smart meters is overblown

Several articles about utility smart meters, most recently the profile of a retired EPA attorney who has concerns about them ("At the center of smart-meter fight," March 24), indicate that those opposed to the devices are mostly concerned about possible health risks of non-ionizing wireless radiation as smart meters send readings over the cell phone networks.

If there is something to worry about with wireless radiation, look to your cell phone. It is used much closer to your body than a smart meter is going to be. In addition, the smart meter is outside your house, adding a further level of attenuation. The strength of the wireless signals falls off with distance according to the inverse square law. Double the distance and the signal drops by one quarter. If you used your cell phone placed one foot away from your head with a head set and your smart meter is 10 feet way, then your cell phone is producing 100 times more non-ionizing wireless radiation than the smart meter.

So is it really worth worrying about wireless aspect of smart meters? After all, no one seems concerned about cell phones that have a much higher wireless output, and used a few inches from your head.

Bob Webber, Ellicott City

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
    Related Content
    • Some consumers oppose smart meters in Md.
      Some consumers oppose smart meters in Md.

      State energy regulators to consider opt-out option

    • Smart-meter foes ask for free opt-out
      Smart-meter foes ask for free opt-out

      They say utility customers shouldn't have to pay to keep old-style meter

    • Baltimore the 'Star-Spangled City'
      Baltimore the 'Star-Spangled City'

      A city motto is to woo tourists, conventions and businesses, not just shipping ("Baltimore: Gateway to America," Jan. 25). Most Americans don't know or care that Baltimore was an important port for immigration and commerce because Baltimore is 300 miles farther inland than any other East...

    • Don't give a free pass to polluters, Mr. Hogan
      Don't give a free pass to polluters, Mr. Hogan

      I am a 79-year-old retired assistant superintendent of Baltimore County Public Schools and a former resident of Dundalk. I lived and worked in the Dundalk area for over 50 years. Though I am retired, I was active in Dundalk leading community projects and civic organizations for many of those...

    • Replace the B&P tunnel
      Replace the B&P tunnel

      There's an elephant in the room underneath West Baltimore that no one is talking about. While transit supporters and critics fight over the fate of the Red and Purple lines, this elephant grows bigger. The elephant in question is the Baltimore and Potomac tunnel ("From vibrations to mosquitoes,...

    • Spend HUD grant on housing, not government
      Spend HUD grant on housing, not government

      Wasn't there a 10-year plan to rid Baltimore of its homeless? Trust me, too many jobs are connected to the $48.3 million federal grant to housing and service programs in Maryland so that is never going to happen ("$48.3M awarded to homeless services programs in Maryland," Jan. 26)!

    Comments
    Loading