Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

Little Sisters should respect workers [Letter]

Since their arrival in Baltimore, the Little Sisters of the Poor have contributed much to the care of the elderly ("Nuns fight health law," Dec. 23). Originally, the Little Sisters financed this care by begging, as there was no government assistance. They had to supply everything for the elderly in their care.

That model changed many years ago with the advent of the federal government safety net for the low income elderly. Currently, the Little Sisters are no more poor than their fellow nuns, and the residents of their homes are no more poor than the residents of many other nursing homes receiving funds from the federal government. The big difference is that you can count on the quality of care provided and the tender loving treatment they provide their residents.

As the federal government does not provide for some amenities that we now see as one step above basic needs, the nuns have continued to beg for help. However, I am concerned by the challenge of the Little Sisters are making to the federal government health care law. What right do they have to monitor or limit the medical treatment of their employees? We are not operating in a feudal society where the employer has strict controls over the entire life of the employee.

What happened to medical privacy and freedom of conscience? I believe that the Little Sisters are displaying a lack of respect for their employees. I also believe that they should be grateful for the federal government assistance that they and their residents have been receiving for many years.

Edward McCarey McDonnell, Baltimore

-
To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Dealing with childhood violence
    Dealing with childhood violence

    Thank you for Andrea McDaniels' brilliant article on the impact of violence on children ("Advocates aim to save Baltimore children from impact of violence," Dec. 14). Pediatricians are so concerned about this issue — called Adverse Childhood Experiences — that we have made the...

  • Reduce littering? Yes. Death wish? No
    Reduce littering? Yes. Death wish? No

    I write in response to Charlotte Eliopoulos' criticism of Dan Rodricks and the other "older guys" on the bus who did not confront the young guy who threw a McDonald's bag into the street ("Littering comes down to a question of attitude," Dec. 14). Someone needs to remind her that it is not...

  • Big Ag must be held to account for bay pollution
    Big Ag must be held to account for bay pollution

    Dan Rodricks' arguments for protecting the Chesapeake Bay from pollution from chicken farms could have been even stronger ("Larry Hogan has a chance to be a green governor," Dec. 13).

  • Injustice is invisible to some
    Injustice is invisible to some

    Letter writer Charlotte Eliopoulos has the audacity to compare littering to the loss of life of three black males from the "bullets of policemen." And she further writes that "...had [the dead black men] been taught and held accountable [I guess she means not to litter] for proper behavior they...

  • Democrats wrong to criticize 9/11 response
    Democrats wrong to criticize 9/11 response

    I am grateful to those who were in charge after 9/11 for taking actions to protect our country, me and my family and our way of life.

  • Why is the news all bad?
    Why is the news all bad?

    After reading the day's newspaper I sometimes ask myself why I bother to keep informed about this city when it seems so obvious there is not much hope for improvement in people's behavior.

Comments
Loading