Get unlimited digital access to $0.99 for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

Guns would reduce murder rate

I just read that in Baltimore, the city that bleeds, there were 12 shootings over a period of four days ("12 shot in four days in city," May 28). Let me see now, at the rate of three per day, over the period of 365 days, that would add up to 1,095! But the residents of Baltimore shouldn't panic, for two very good reasons. First, we all know that shootings at the rate of there per day most likely are not sustainable as Baltimore's criminal culture simply cannot maintain that pace, or can it?

Second, those recently-passed draconian gun laws, once they kick in, will certainly eliminate that problem. Isn't that essentially what we were told by Comrade Gov. Martin O'Malley? The fact that those laws only impact upon law abiding gun owners notwithstanding, Governor O'Malley believes that by criminalizing the behavior of otherwise law abiding citizens, he can prevent the real criminals (who obey no laws, after all, that is why they are called "criminals" in the first place) from violating those laws! Is this reasoning merely convoluted or is it wishful thinking by a bleeding hearted liberal socialist governor or is it well-intentioned social engineering by liberals who simply do not understand nor support the Constitution or is it something more onerous?

In every case where a government has sought to "control" legal gun ownership by the people, one or more of the following have occurred: confiscation followed, criminals were emboldened, crime increased — in some cases, exponentially with the most heinous being home invasions — black markets for firearms and ammunition evolved, victimization escalated, government intruded even further upon individual rights and liberty was lost, the people effectively enslaved. Make no mistakes here, in every case, one or more of those "after effects" have emerged. Do we need or want any of that to happen here?

I am amazed by the fact that the law abiding black residents of Maryland, particularly within Baltimore, and there are many of them out there, are not opposed, vehemently so, to this infringement upon their right to own and carry the means of self-preservation. Crime, murderous crime, is a reality and it is a sad fact that far too much of it exists in those black neighborhoods where far too many good people are being held hostage by a viciously violent minority. Economist John Lott Jr. did an immense and comprehensive study of the effect of "concealed carry laws" on crime. He studied every county in every state and concluded that where such laws exist, crime goes down. His work has been challenged quite often but never successfully. And I know of what I speak.

Robert DiStefano

The writer is a retired Baltimore City Police Department major.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Police say shooting that killed 16-month-old was a setup
    Police say shooting that killed 16-month-old was a setup

    Boy's father recounts the moments before three men sprayed car with bullets

  • Coping with climate change
    Coping with climate change

    A recent letter to the editor points out that a solution to climate change is available that could be supported by Republicans ("Carbon fee is bipartisan solution to climate change," Jan 22).

  • Turning a blind eye to mental illness
    Turning a blind eye to mental illness

    We were outraged to read that mental health funding was slashed by the Board of Public Works earlier this month in order to close a state budget gap ("Balancing Md.'s budget on the backs of the mentally ill," Jan. 21).

  • Hogan's budget cuts will hurt too many Marylanders
    Hogan's budget cuts will hurt too many Marylanders

    Gov. Larry Hogan campaigned on a pledge to reduce the budget, but the impact may be disproportionately felt by the most vulnerable: small businesses, people on fixed or limited incomes and children ("Hogan budget would cut state worker pay, city school aid," Jan. 22).

  • Hogan should derail Red Line
    Hogan should derail Red Line

    It is particularly disappointing that outgoing Maryland Transportation Secretary James T. Smith Jr.'s pro-Red Line commentary ignored the most basic facts about this massive and expensive project ("Why should we pursue the Red Line?" Jan. 21). Let's look at each of Mr. Smith's points and see...

  • Western Md. faces fracking threat
    Western Md. faces fracking threat

    The recent article about fracking in Western Maryland seemed to me to raise more arguments for not drilling for natural gas in Garrett County than for it ("Fracking debate intensifies in Western Maryland, those benefits would be relatively short-term since "Western Maryland's gas reserves are...