Summer Savings! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Fracking dangers are overstated

While we agree with Katie Huffling that safe, responsible, tightly-regulated natural gas development must be done in a way that protects "the health of our communities and the environment," her recent op-ed ("The hidden health risks of fracking," July 20) lodges a series of claims that are simply unsupported by the facts.

Her claim that rural communities are "being destroyed by drilling" is as inflammatory as it is false. We live and raise our families in these communities and care deeply about protecting our environment. We also understand the positive economic benefits tied to safe American natural gas development. Nearly 240,000 Pennsylvania jobs are tied to the Marcellus Shale industry, and more natural gas is being used to meet our growing energy needs, bringing about cleaner air and more consumer savings.

Your readers should know, despite Ms. Huffling's claims, that Pennsylvania's new bipartisan natural gas law represents one of the most forward-leaning regulatory reforms in the nation, aimed at protecting our air and water, while ensuring natural gas is safely produced.

Indeed, the new law requires full disclosure of hydraulic fracturing fluids, which are made up of more than 99.5 percent water and sand, with a small portion of commonly used additives representing typically less than 0.5 percent. Our organization's members also post all fracturing fluids — on a well-by-well basis — on, an online database administered by environmental regulators. And President Barack Obama's top energy adviser, Heather Zichal, recently said, "As an administration, we believe that FracFocus is an important tool that provides transparency to the American people." Further, the new law requires 2,500 foot pre-drill baseline water tests, an important public health initiative that our industry absolutely supports.

However unfortunate it is that some continue to resort to scare tactics and fear-mongering, our industry will remain focused on a fact-based dialogue about safe, responsible, job-creating American natural gas development.

Kathryn Klaber, Pittsburgh, Pa.

The writer is president of the Marcellus Shale Coalition.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Western Md. faces fracking threat

    Western Md. faces fracking threat

    The recent article about fracking in Western Maryland seemed to me to raise more arguments for not drilling for natural gas in Garrett County than for it ("Fracking debate intensifies in Western Maryland, those benefits would be relatively short-term since "Western Maryland's gas reserves are limited."

  • Fracking's false promise

    Fracking's false promise

    Letter writer Matthew Dempsey wants us all to jump on the fracking bandwagon, quoting governors of both parties, including former Gov. Martin O'Malley, that "regulations will effectively manage the risks of fracking" ("Fracking causes no harm," April 2).

  • Risks of fracking are unacceptable

    Risks of fracking are unacceptable

    I am a resident and property owner in Garrett County and want my voice heard by state officials: I do not want fracking in Maryland.

  • Fracking an assault on the planet

    Fracking an assault on the planet

    The Baltimore Sun recently carried a letter from a reader advocating fracking in Maryland, apparently placing the priority on overpopulating the planet and "to hell with the environment" ("Md. shouldn't make the same mistake as New York in banning fracking," March 31). Already, fracking has been...

  • Fracking causes no harm

    Fracking causes no harm

    With the House of Delegates recently voting to institute a three-year moratorium on hydraulic fracturing, it's clear that politics could trump science in Maryland ("Md. shouldn't make the same mistake as New York in banning fracking," March 31).

  • Md. shouldn't make the same mistake as New York in banning fracking

    Md. shouldn't make the same mistake as New York in banning fracking

    I live in Deposit in New York's Southern Tier and know first-hand how New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo's decision to ban fracking has taken away our chance to transform our economically depressed communities into thriving ones ("New York bans fracking, citing health risks," Dec. 18).

  • Fracking's risks are 'considerable'

    Fracking's risks are 'considerable'

    I applaud your March 23 editorial endorsing a moratorium on fracking in Western Maryland ("Fracking deserves a pause," March 25). My considerable research reveals fracking in Maryland imposes severe and permanent environmental risks with questionable to negative long-term economic impacts to produce...

  • Fracking moratorium is the right step

    Fracking moratorium is the right step

    Your editorial ("Fracking deserves a pause," March 25) got it right on all counts. Fracking simply does not mesh well with our tourist industry in Western Maryland.