Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. $12 for 12 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

Rodricks disparages free speech

The robocalls made on behalf of Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. were less cynical than Dan Rodricks' column ("Drawing the line in cutthroat business of politics," Dec. 7). To describe protected political speech defenses as "hedging" betrays a sneering disbelief in basic First Amendment freedoms.

Constitutional rights are not technicalities.

Thomas F. McDonough, Towson

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Robocall incident should spur changes

    In the weeks leading up to the Maryland gubernatorial election in 2006, the campaign of then-Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr.commissioned and distributed "voter guides" which were, in fact, filled with misinformation. The leaflets falsely implied that Mr. Ehrlich and Republican Senate nominee Michael...

  • Free Julius Henson

    I fully concur in all of the points made in the recent opinion piece by Larry S. Gibson of the University of Maryland School of Law ("Henson shouldn't go to jail," June 16).