Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Something doesn't add up about private school vouchers

For once I agree with Marta Mossburg, that something needs to be done about Baltimore City public schools ("Baltimore City schoolchildren deserve a real choice," Sept. 12). But I'm very curious where she came up with the numbers she uses to push her idea for vouchers.

Unless she's living in a very different world from Baltimore, her numbers just don't add up. She says that Baltimore City spends $14,711 per student, which she says is the third highest in the nation. That may be true, but then she follows it up by saying, "Private school costs are lower than public school costs" and that a voucher system would cost only $42,00 per pupil over a three year period. Where in the world is she getting these numbers?

For this school year, the tuition at Gilman School is slightly over $22,000 per pupil, more than $7,000 more than what the City School system is spending. Boys Latin and St. Paul's are about the same, and Friends School is closer to $23,000 per pupil. Oldfields School and St. Timothy's School, which include room and board, are both over $45,000 per pupil, making them more than $30,000 more expensive per year than Baltimore City public schools.

So I'm puzzled. How in the world can Ms. Mossburg claim that private school is less expensive than public school? She must have Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan doing her math for her. And where does this "$4,200 per pupil over a three year period" number come from? If the state only gave vouchers worth that much to send a child to private school, that still leaves the parents responsible for picking up the remaining $62,000 — and that's if they choose the least expensive private schools. I fail to see how that's going to be any help at all.

Given the dismal picture Ms. Mossburg paints of academics in the Baltimore City public school system, and the shaky grasp of numbers she seems to demonstrate in her article, I can only reach one conclusion. Ms. Mossburg must have attended one of Baltimore's public schools.

William Smith, Baltimore

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Red Line benefits ignored

    Red Line benefits ignored

    Gov. Larry Hogan's decision to cancel the Red Line light rail project after over 10 years of hard work and $288 million in tax dollars spent was a shocker for sure ("Hogan goes off the tracks," June 25). We have to ask exactly what kind of analysis did he do?

  • Treat Lee and Jackson as veterans

    Treat Lee and Jackson as veterans

    Confederate soldiers are legal veterans under U.S. law, and shouldn't this apply to the statue of Confederate veterans Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson ("Status of Confederate statues to be reviewed in Baltimore," June 30)?

  • Baltimore can pay for its own light rail

    Baltimore can pay for its own light rail

    Since most citizens of Maryland, especially those who do not live in Baltimore, would have to supply the $3 billion for the Red Line, I understand why Gov. Larry Hogan has turned it down ("City leaders remain dedicated to fighting for Red Line," July 1).

  • Beware the allure of the evil tempter

    Beware the allure of the evil tempter

    We need our young people to wake up and realize they are being used as pawns in a high-stakes game. They do the selling, the killing, the robbing and stealing while the tempter sits and enjoys his freedom. The tempter spends no time in jail and gets to dictate who lives and who dies. And our youth...

  • Don't tear down Confederate statues

    Don't tear down Confederate statues

    Has the world gone completely nuts? The Confederate battle flag has been used as a blatantly racist taunt for several generations by large numbers of ignorant hateful people. The Confederate statues around Maryland are a significant part of our history and should be a reminder to new generations...

  • Md. embraces patient-centered care

    Md. embraces patient-centered care

    Marylanders should be proud of the leadership demonstrated by the Health Services Cost Review Commission ("Better care for less," June 30).

Comments
Loading

77°