Summer Sale! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

Government can't dictate upward mobility

I have habitually and patiently read Thomas F. Schaller's column for some time now. His most recent ("An American recipe for class immobility," Feb. 21) warrants a response.

First of all, I am hopeful that Mr. Schaller understands the fundamental differences between Scandinavian countries (with roughly 26 million homogenous inhabitants) and the United States (a nation of 310 million multi-ethnic residents). Let's not forget some salient political and economic differences: Denmark has one of the most stringent immigration regulations in the European Union. The external debt per capita for countries such as Denmark and Norway are about twice that of the U.S. The day of reckoning for these countries will come.

Among the references to the mythical benefits of expanded unionization, increasing taxes on wealthy individuals, and raising the minimum wage, Mr. Schaller goes on to blame conservative interest groups in thwarting the democratic process. Although there is little substance to this claim, perhaps we should put to a national referendum to say, President Barack Obama's national health care plan.

Indeed, there are some profound challenges that many Americans face in improving their personal economic circumstances. However, mobility can't be engineered by a government policy. The goal is to foster economic opportunity. This is why Europeans, including the Scandinavians whom Mr. Schaller worships, continue to emigrate to America.

Neal W. Bonner, Ellicott City

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Schaller views government through rose-tinted glasses

    I take exception to Thomas Schaller's assertion that "Overhead in federal insurance programs like Medicare and Social Security is minimal. By some estimates, only 2 percent of expenditures go to administrative overhead" ("Sure, government is flawed – but markets are too," May 16).

  • Why government can't match the private sector

    Thomas Schaller make a case for how the private sector can be just as if not more flawed than the public sector ("Sure, government is flawed – but markets are too," May 16). One aspect of the comparison that he (perhaps intentionally?) failed to mention, however, is that in the private sector,...

  • Private sector may be flawed but still offers choice

    I agree with Thomas F. Schaller that there is waste and imperfection in the marketplace as well as government ("Sure, government is flawed — but markets are, too," May 16), but the pivotal difference is choice.

  • It's time for tax reform that benefits the middle class

    Thomas Neale's recent letter to the editor employs uses usual Republican tactic of throwing out irrelevant statistics to confuse the issue of tax fairness ("The wealthy pay more than their fair share," May 14). It doesn't matter that the top 1 percent of taxpayers pay 38 percent of the income taxes....

  • Pope Francis catches up with God on abortion

    Regarding your story "Pope to allow priests to absolve abortion in holy year," Sept. 3), I'm so glad the Pope is on board, because God has been forgiving abortions since the first one occurred.

  • The victims of violence

    The victims of violence

    Regarding your recent front-page reports on the victims of violence — one on the Freddie Gray case, the other of the 45 murder victims in July — as mind-boggling as these stories were, my first thought was that "black lives matter," "all lives matter" no matter how they were killed or by whom.

Comments
Loading
75°