Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

Government can't dictate upward mobility

I have habitually and patiently read Thomas F. Schaller's column for some time now. His most recent ("An American recipe for class immobility," Feb. 21) warrants a response.

First of all, I am hopeful that Mr. Schaller understands the fundamental differences between Scandinavian countries (with roughly 26 million homogenous inhabitants) and the United States (a nation of 310 million multi-ethnic residents). Let's not forget some salient political and economic differences: Denmark has one of the most stringent immigration regulations in the European Union. The external debt per capita for countries such as Denmark and Norway are about twice that of the U.S. The day of reckoning for these countries will come.

Among the references to the mythical benefits of expanded unionization, increasing taxes on wealthy individuals, and raising the minimum wage, Mr. Schaller goes on to blame conservative interest groups in thwarting the democratic process. Although there is little substance to this claim, perhaps we should put to a national referendum to say, President Barack Obama's national health care plan.

Indeed, there are some profound challenges that many Americans face in improving their personal economic circumstances. However, mobility can't be engineered by a government policy. The goal is to foster economic opportunity. This is why Europeans, including the Scandinavians whom Mr. Schaller worships, continue to emigrate to America.

Neal W. Bonner, Ellicott City

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Schaller views government through rose-tinted glasses

    I take exception to Thomas Schaller's assertion that "Overhead in federal insurance programs like Medicare and Social Security is minimal. By some estimates, only 2 percent of expenditures go to administrative overhead" ("Sure, government is flawed – but markets are too," May 16).

  • Why government can't match the private sector

    Thomas Schaller make a case for how the private sector can be just as if not more flawed than the public sector ("Sure, government is flawed – but markets are too," May 16). One aspect of the comparison that he (perhaps intentionally?) failed to mention, however, is that in the private...

  • Private sector may be flawed but still offers choice

    I agree with Thomas F. Schaller that there is waste and imperfection in the marketplace as well as government ("Sure, government is flawed — but markets are, too," May 16), but the pivotal difference is choice.

  • It's time for tax reform that benefits the middle class

    Thomas Neale's recent letter to the editor employs uses usual Republican tactic of throwing out irrelevant statistics to confuse the issue of tax fairness ("The wealthy pay more than their fair share," May 14). It doesn't matter that the top 1 percent of taxpayers pay 38 percent of the income...

  • Rodricks wrong on bay pollution
    Rodricks wrong on bay pollution

    It is time for those writing for The Sun's editorial pages to check their facts. Columnist Dan Rodricks writes that poultry farmers are allowing their chicken manure to run into the Chesapeake Bay ("Larry Hogan has a chance to be a green governor," Dec. 13.

  • Protest unnecessary when justice is served
    Protest unnecessary when justice is served

    Have they really missed the point? First, it was Police Commissioner Anthony Batts who wondered if there would be protest marches following the alleged shooting of police officer Andrew Groman by a black man, Donte Jones, here in Baltimore. Then there was the letter from a reader complaining...