Get unlimited digital access to baltimoresun.com. $0.99 for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

What world does the Supreme Court live in?

Having read your recent editorial about the Supreme Court's upcoming ruling on campaign finance limits ("Another blow coming to campaign finance reform," Oct. 7), here's what I would tell the justices:

To Justice Antonin Scalia: Who do you think is going to be invited to a dinner with unlimited access to a candidate over the course of an evening — the 70,000 people who each gave $50, the 7,000 who each gave $500 or the one person who gave $3.5 million?

Don't you think $3.5 million is a heck of a lot of money? It seems to you fanciful to think that candidates will feel indebted to big donors? What world do you live in? A justice of the Supreme Court of the United States of America so removed from reality as to be able to make statements such as those quoted above lives in rarefied circumstances, indeed.

To Chief Justice John Roberts: I consider $50 a "modest" contribution; how would you define a "modest" contribution? Would it seem fairer to you if, instead of making one contribution of $3.5 million to one candidate or political group, that person made seven "modest" contributions of $500,000 to each of seven candidates or groups? Or perhaps, 70 "modest" contributions of $50,000 each? Where would you draw the line, above which contributions become threats to the functioning of our political process?

To all the justices: You've already done your best to undermine the democratic process with the Citizens United ruling; continue down this road and see what happens to an oligarchy when all those people for whom $3.5 million is unimaginable wealth become completely disenchanted and irritable.

Diana C. Schramm, Baltimore

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • SRB: On school funding, Baltimore has set the example
    SRB: On school funding, Baltimore has set the example

    The recent letter to the editor ("Mayor neglects school funding, too," Jan. 30) stating that Baltimore has not led by example through our investments in education, isn't supported by any measure of fact. Education funding has increased in Baltimore City while both our short-term and long-term...

  • Turning off 'Belicheat'
    Turning off 'Belicheat'

    Come Sunday, after never missing a Super Bowl for as long as I can remember, I will not be watching the "Stupid" Bowl ("Let the NFL's air out," Jan. 23)! I am a huge football fan and growing up every Sunday our TV was on for the game. In high school, I was on the pompom squad and never missed a...

  • Terps women deserve attention
    Terps women deserve attention

    Does anyone care about the outstanding women's basketball team from the University of Maryland ("No. 5 Terps women rout Michigan, 91-65, for 12th win in a row," Jan. 30)?

  • Don't limit Amazon jobs to city dwellers
    Don't limit Amazon jobs to city dwellers

    After reading about Amazon's hiring plans ("City to host application sessions for 1,000 Amazon jobs," Jan. 28), I am a bit perturbed by what Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake had to say. She said she wants to make sure the jobs go to city residents.

  • Women deserve same attention as Terps men
    Women deserve same attention as Terps men

    Let's see now. The Maryland men's basketball team lost to Ohio State and The Sun printed a half-page article with a color action photograph on the front of the sports section of January 30 ("Maryland's blow-out loss at Ohio State was reminiscent of last year").

  • Let Netanyahu speak
    Let Netanyahu speak

    I find it necessary to respond to Frederic B. Hill's odious and erroneous op-ed, "Boehner's unwise move" (Jan. 28).

Comments
Loading