Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Standardized tests have their uses in college admissions

Op-ed contributor Carlene Buccino's argument against the objectivity of SAT scores is compelling but flawed ("The best test scores money can buy," Dec. 13). There is a robust literature that supports the use of SAT scores in the admissions process.

Generally, institutions of higher learning are well-versed regarding literature that suggests the cultural, socio-economic and gender biases of the SAT and other standardized exams. In fact, some institutions tier the SAT bottom-line in adherence to the literature.

In essence, when the literature supports a lower average score for a given cohort of applicants, the institution reduces the score necessary for admission. While this may outwardly appear as favoritism (by lowing standards), it is a practice supported by the data.

Research suggests that the best predictors of college-level and graduate school performance are grade point average, the predominant factor, coupled with standardized test scores. When SAT scores are coupled with GPA, the ability to predict performance is greatly improved.

When 30,000 high school students are applying for admission, having an SAT bottom line assists in the process of discovering "worthwhile" applicants, in the sense of people who fit the unique brand of an institution. For example, an art student applying to a technical school may not be an ideal fit for either the student or the institution.

There is also an experiential value to completing standardized exams prior to undergraduate studies. An ever growing volume of undergraduates are continuing their education, moving onto graduate and/or professional school. Numerous studies support experience/exposure results in improved scores. Translation: If you take the SAT now, you may be better prepared for the GRE, MCAT, etc.

Given the data, accepting a student with higher SAT scores is logical for many institutions. As the ability to predict student performance improves, so does the ability to predict graduation rates, students who will continue their education into graduate school, and more. It is an intellectual arms-race for the best students, who in turn become the best alumni.

Beyond academia, licensure exams and certifications are necessary in a number of industries. As a result, the ability to perform on standardized exams is critical. While one cannot directly equate performance on the SAT to performance on the Medical Boards or similar exams, exposure is still a piece of the puzzle.

Think about it. Would you want a physician who could not pass the minimum standards of their field?

Derek H. Trott

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
    Related Content
    • The importance of EMS
      The importance of EMS

      Hundreds of emergency and mobile health care professionals will soon assemble on Capitol Hill to educate Congress on their challenges in providing quality patient care to their communities and in obtaining needed resources to prepare for public health emergencies and other mass casualty incidents.

    • The U.S. is losing big by skimping on foreign aid
      The U.S. is losing big by skimping on foreign aid

      The sharp improvement in U.S.-Cuba relations is being hailed as the long-overdue end of a pointless enmity left over from the end of the Cold War ("The handshake with Castro," April 13).

    • 'Private' schools don't just educate the wealthy
      'Private' schools don't just educate the wealthy

      Benjamin Franklin said that "nothing in life is certain, except death and taxes." In Maryland we can add to that list the annual doomsday warnings from the public school lobby and its friends in the ACLU whenever anyone suggests there ought to be some sort of public aid assistance to families who...

    • Carson can win in 2016
      Carson can win in 2016

      Dr. Ben Carson should run for Maryland's open Senate seat in 2016. He'll win it. Then we'll see about the presidency in 2020.

    • Pills don't prevent STDs
      Pills don't prevent STDs

      This letter is in response to Susan Reimer's column about the GOP's attitude about birth control ("On birth control, young Republicans get it," April 15). I think Ms. Reimer's opinion is very narrow-minded. While I agree that young people often have premarital sex with no desire to procreate, I...

    • Red Line racism?
      Red Line racism?

      Letters such as "Red Line's unanswered questions" (April 12) infuriate me because the historic problem in Baltimore with light rail was always who would use it rather than who wouldn't. By that I mean white suburbanites don't want inner city black people to travel into their neighborhoods. The...